At least enough "advice" has been given regarding the meanwhile relevant area restriction, which signals a certain willingness. It was not for nothing that I already pointed this out back then (and was almost insulted).
At least enough "advice" was given regarding the temporarily relevant area limitation, signaling a certain willingness. It was not for nothing that I already pointed that out back then (and was almost insulted).
Well, what do you think how many tricksters will be out there
Civil servants or the public administration can sometimes be a bit sluggish when it comes to introducing new regulations; but it doesn’t take long; and it gets serious. We’re not talking about peanuts like with advertising cost optimization. And especially in Bavaria where twice as much is at stake....
For owner-occupied property from the past, it is actually quite simple. Matching the registration office address history with the land registry offices.
For owner-occupied property from the past, this is actually quite simple. Matching the address history in the registration records with the land registry offices.
No one bothers with that effort. That can at most be carried out in suspected cases for evidentiary purposes. My question is exactly: how should the concrete suspicion arise in the clerk at all?