Wait with the building application because of the child construction allowance

So logically, one should go to Jordan, since there is much more to gain there.
The only problem is that the funds for Jordan are loans and not a transfer payment...
They have to be paid back eventually, even with interest. That’s a good way to make money, see Greece. They paid us 3 billion in interest alone.

You don’t seriously expect me to believe that Germany even makes money from the loans?
Regarding Jordan:
The LOAN amounts to 100 million US dollars.
The 384 million euros refer to development aid, not a loan.

Either way, the money will most likely not be paid back.

And you can have as many statements about it as you want. The money will thus be missing elsewhere.

You really are a heavily persecuted one... What the heck are loans or even development aid to Jordan supposed to have to do with the child construction allowance? You are the achiever, you just had to perform more for yourself or else go to Jordan after all. P.S. I support the horse tax! For every time you chop off, there’s an extra notice.

Of course, loans bring in money as long as they are serviced. They are an investment of the lender and are supposed to generate profit. Greece has made money so far, not lost. Even if [BLÖD] says otherwise.

And you can have as many statements about it as you want. The money is thus missing elsewhere.

Just like the 7.5 billion that are supposed to be sunk into Stuttgart 21 (a train station that will not work) as well as the 4.5 billion + rising costs that have already been sunk into BER + a bit of small stuff from non-functioning infrastructure projects that the country of poets, thinkers, and engineers can’t get right. Well over 10 billion are being burned domestically. But a few pennies in development aid, with which we make ourselves happy.

The money is thus missing elsewhere.

Which, by the way, is economic nonsense. A state is not dependent on money for its expenditures that it receives or even has lying around somewhere. Nothing is missing except political will. If one wanted to, one could. But one does not want to.

A state is not dependent on money it collects or even has lying around for its expenditures.

Explain to me, how does it work then?

I don’t understand why you don’t see the state as a company.
The budget is nothing other than the annual budget.
Amount x comes in, amount y goes out.

If I have 300 billion available, of which I use, for example, 10 billion for development aid, I still have 290 billion left. This game continues indefinitely until you reach zero or go into debt.

So why does everyone here think that the costs for development aid, asylum matters, etc. do not affect the available budget for further expenditures?
What is your approach? Just print money?

Not to forget all the social benefits that currently flow to all refugees and are then further transferred abroad to their families via Money gray % and co. Without ever having pumped 0 € into the state.

I don't understand why you don't see the state as a company.

Let's suppose the state were a company. Since when is a company's annual budget limited by its income? If a company has an idea it wants to implement and needs to invest more than its income allows, does it just drop it? No! It gets money, on the stock market, from the savings bank, from the business angel, whatever.

or goes into debt.

Exactly. Or! And a state, as long as it has its own currency, unlike a company, cannot go bankrupt as long as it borrows in its own currency. That's why a state is not a company.

( Japan has, famously, overextended itself with its 250% government debt ratio. Failed state with hyperinflation... what? wait! )

It is not government debt that wrongs the coming generation, but investments not made. I bump over badly patched roads to dilapidated schools while at home my child is being cared for because there was no daycare spot. But I have a paper saying that Germany has little debt. Thanks to the generations before me for this clever plan. Thx a lot.

What is your approach? Just print money?

You mean what the central banks of the first world have been doing for some time? The missing sufficient condition is: To whom do I give this money? If I pump it into those already wealthy, it looks for investments and all assets get more expensive. See land for houses. Not a single school was built there. So just printing money doesn't even achieve that.

If the state can't capture such profits, it has to go into debt itself. Or just do nothing and wonder why people vote for the AfD.