Wait with the building application because of the child construction allowance

How are houses viewed in which only the ground floor is developed and the upper floor is only expandable?

OT
Small correction.
Apart from Max Müller with his rented condominium, larger investors are usually subject to corporate tax and pay 15% CT + solidarity surcharge. Income from asset management also does not fall under trade tax.

So, I researched again. At the corporate level, corporate tax and solidarity surcharge apply, but not trade tax. At the owner level of the company, 60% of the personal tax rate applies under the partial income procedure. Assuming this is 42% + solidarity surcharge, or rather we should anyway consider the marginal situation, then from 100 EUR profit of the rental GmbH, 61.80 EUR net remain, correct? Without an intermediate rental GmbH, 42% + solidarity surcharge apply to the entire profit, so only 55.69 EUR remain.

Just out of curiosity. I actually concluded my last rental contract in a fairly large building (I estimate about 800-1,000 sqm of living space) at the time with a private person, so why actually, if the rental GmbH is cheaper? Of course, we can assume that the person renting out 900 sqm of living space in a good location probably paid the top tax rate.

and now back to the topic. When is the big money coming for whom?

actually quite simple:
You find a mistress and build a semi-detached house with her and one of your children with 120m². Your wife plays the same game with the second child right next door. There is even 2x construction child allowance, and after 10 years the wall is removed (the one that coincidentally already had a door in it before) and you have a nice home with 240m².

Sorry, but after we have now gone through all political topics, I lack the necessary seriousness until hard facts come again.

The 384 million euros refer to development aid, not a loan.

So the state is supposed to cut development aid to a third world country so that we here in Central Europe can build detached single-family homes with home offices more cheaply?
Always nice to see where society is headed...

So the state is supposed to cut development aid to a third-world country so that we here in Central Europe can build detached single-family homes with home offices more cheaply?
Always nice to see where society is heading...

Correct.
If you don’t like that, you are free to use your personal assets for aid.

Furthermore, I am not saying that all development aid should be stopped.
However, one has to ask whether the balance between tax relief for one’s own people and social expenditures for non-Germans still fits.
And as I said, everyone is free to use their personal assets. But for most, that’s where their compassion ends.

Does every thread by HausbauTiNa now have to be hijacked for unrelated refugee discussions/development aid/${random}? Wasn't there a separate thread for that by chand ? BTT please