Wait with the building application because of the child construction allowance

And does the major investor vary the price depending on whether Otto Müller buys the apartment for himself or as a capital investor?

No, of course not. The apartment costs 300k and the capital investor pays 300k. The family of four pays 300k and gets 24k back from the state.

And yes, it actually saves trips. That is immensely important. Mobility costs will rise sharply in the coming years, partly also politically mandated.

What is currently often discussed, for example, is the dismantling of the sewage system in rural areas and the transition to so-called decentralized solutions, I hope you know what is meant.

Here in the forum the opinion is usually different, but yes, you can manage with it! And I also find the limitation harsh, but justified. Only the absolute minimum is now subsidized, anyone who wants more has to continue to pay for everything themselves.

The pursuit of even more m2 is really nonsense. We live with 3 children on 129m2 and each child has their own room, we have a bedroom with a dressing room and a sufficiently large bathroom with a huge bathtub. According to the law, we would still be eligible for funding. And it is more than enough to provide all residents with a „species-appropriate“ life.

But the additional hobby room or the extra-large living room is not supported by the state. And since it is about taxpayer money, I think that is perfectly right.

Here in the forum the opinion is usually different, but you can manage with it! And I also find the limit strict, but justified. Now only the absolute minimum is subsidized, those who want more have to continue to provide everything themselves.

The pursuit of more and more m2 is really nonsense. We live with 3 children on 129m2 and each child has their own room, we have a bedroom with a walk-in closet and a sufficiently large bathroom with a huge bathtub. According to the law, we would still be eligible for subsidies. And it is more than enough to offer all residents a "species-appropriate" life.

The additional hobby room or the extra-large living room, however, the state does not want to subsidize. And since it concerns tax money, I find that completely right.

The additional hobby room or the extra-large living room is simply not something the state wants to promote. And since it’s about public funds, I think that is completely justified.

The additional hobby room or the extra-large living room is simply not something the state wants to promote. And since it’s about tax money, I think that’s perfectly right.

They get by with fewer square meters

And if instead of the hobby room, as in my case, a study is needed due to home office? Does that person then just have "bad luck"? The whole topic ignores a modern way of life....