KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

50km from Nuremberg under 100€/sqm? Where exactly? That would be a jackpot.

Approximately in Beilngries, 80 euros plus development costs.

I am in favor of private builders getting their applications approved.

Project developers can take a detour once in a while; they've stuffed themselves enough over the past years!
As far as I'm concerned, private households with an income under 100k as well.

But such a sensible simple rule probably won't happen again.

I think you equate project developers here with rich bigwigs who build lofts for equally rich people.
Of course those exist, but just as well there is multi-family housing for ordinary people. Especially those who cannot afford a house. Why should those in particular have to hold back?

I don't think it's right that whether you get approval depends on chance with these sums. It would be interesting to have this approval practice evaluated by a lawyer in light of the sudden stop.

Who says chance? A large part was probably automated, but even in such a world you do spot checks and in your constellation it would also be conceivable that you came under individual review because of the withdrawal (or other criteria).
You can prove chance, and that against the background that there is no legal entitlement to funding.
Then you can calculate your damages and also sue the energy consultant and whoever else if you think you can be successful with it.

I don’t think it’s right that whether you get an approval or not depends on chance with these amounts. It would be interesting to have this approval practice evaluated by a lawyer in light of the sudden stop.

I have thought about it, but since there is no official rejection yet, I initially contacted the Verbraucherzentrale Bayern to get their assessment. They told me that this is a federal political matter and would fall within the responsibility of their umbrella organization - the Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv).

If I really received a rejection, I think I would go to a lawyer.

You can try to prove coincidence, especially against the background that there is no legal entitlement to funding.

There is no legal entitlement to funding, but there is a right to equal opportunities in the allocation of funding.

Normally, this is achieved according to the principle "first come, first served." The principle of random selection does not ensure equal opportunities.

I thought about it, but since there is no official rejection yet, I first contacted the Verbraucherzentrale Bayern to get their assessment. They told me that this is a federal political matter and would fall under the jurisdiction of their umbrella organization - the Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv).

If I really received a rejection, I think I would go to a lawyer.

I think this approval practice is not known at all to the public (and the politicians). Your case should be covered in the media, as it doesn’t get any more illustrative than this. These approvals are then purely a lottery.

Your case should be brought to the media, as it doesn’t get any more illustrative than this. These promises then become a pure lottery.

That is a good point. Maybe you need to have some connections to get the right attention :D