KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

If political statements have no place in this forum, then jabs regarding subsidies for high earners have no place here either, because the subsidy was never tied to income.

Please don't take it personally, but that is classic whataboutism... the next method of the AfD.

Who votes brown is brown. The AfD stands for all that a democracy does not stand for. AfD voters should maybe read the [Wahlprogramm].

I think we should end the pro and con AFD discussion, it’s pointless. The AFD was one of 47 approved parties in the last federal election and therefore voteable by every eligible voter. Anyone who went to vote could give their vote to one of these 47 approved parties. There is no instruction that you must vote for one of the approved parties or that you are not allowed to vote, that is democracy.

Anyone who votes brown is brown. The AfD stands for everything that a democracy does not stand for. AfD voters should perhaps read the election program.

I wouldn't endorse the first sentence like that. There are also many confused protest voters among them. However, the last two sentences are something everyone can truly take to heart. We should now also end the digressions about politics. It really doesn't belong here.

Above all, not as a blanket frontal attack. A more effective approach would be to question why one believes that this party whose name I will not mention helps the aspiring homeowner. As with the predecessor parties from the spectrum, the personnel stand out more for personal enrichment.

With lower funding - if it comes to that - one must also consider whether it is still worthwhile at all.

Many forget here as well that the repayment grant from KfW reduces the 50-year depreciation of AfA by the full amount. With funding of 18,000 euros, there is an increased tax of approximately 9,500 € over 50 years (at a 25% tax rate). Then there is not much left from the grant. Unless the funding is concealed from the tax office.....