KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

That is a good hint. Maybe you need to have some connections to get the right attention :D

It might not be that hard, the topic is still quite current. At Focus, Spiegel, and Bild, I quickly found phone numbers or email addresses at the bottom of the page in the imprint or under "Contact" for "informants" or own stories. You can write an email with a curiosity-provoking subject (e.g. KfW stop: promise lottery, or something similar) and send it to the various editorial offices. Maybe someone will get back to you. If they need more material, I’m also happy to tell my case, but yours is a bit more illustrative!

And is all that still solid?

Yes, I think so, why not?.................

And sorry that the funding is limited, everyone who has ever submitted an application knows that.

And, that is also explicitly stated in the funding documents. And, after all, in otherwise often poorly digitized Germany, one has to admit that a lot of automation has already taken place here. The fact that applications do not pass through the automation but are manually reviewed after a random principle (I assume now) should actually be in all of our interest for the review of the proper use of tax money. And .. I remember some floor plan or financing threads here where consciously "2 units" were planned, which were not meant to be brought to life, but were planned for the purpose of obtaining even more funding.

About in Beilngries, 80 euros plus development costs.

Now I am relieved. That's over 70km and with development then no less than 100€ :)

I think you are equating project developers with rich fat cats who build lofts for equally rich people. Of course, they exist, but there is also multi-family housing for quite ordinary people. Especially those who cannot afford a house. Why should they have to give way in particular? Who says coincidence? A large part was probably automated, but even in such a world you do random checks, and in your constellation it would also be conceivable that you ended up in the individual examination because of the withdrawal (or other criteria). You can prove the coincidence and that against the background that there is no legal claim to funding. Then you can calculate your damage and also sue the energy consultant and others if you believe you can be successful with it.

Absolutely not. But most 'project developers' who 'develop' large-scale new residential areas secretly collude so hard with the local authorities that it almost borders on subsidy fraud. Feel free to prove me wrong. When a company owns the land development, I then market developer-tied houses and at the same time am allowed to co-determine on the city council, something is going wrong. Then 'dubious' foreign investors come into play who provide the capital, and the golden goose can't produce the bars fast enough. Unfortunately, this is the dark side of capitalism. Therefore, at least families in our country should have the right to a home (which they) pay off hard, sometimes until retirement. Green or not, but I have unfortunately been missing a sense of proper management and structured administration of household funds in the right places for too long in this country.]

now I'm relieved. That's over 70km and with development costs then not under €100 anymore :)

You can also look around Großhöbing, Greding: land value 50 euros, 43 km up the A9 and you are in N-Moorenbrunn. same for 92360 Mühlhausen, there you also get quite a bit of infrastructure. In that area there are always offers in the small villages and if you have to drive to the south of N it's still OK. You just have to get used to the barking :p