KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

Rather no, because the KfW money is only available after the completion of the construction. It is then used to finance things like the garden, garage, or the ETF. The house will still be standing.

I agree with you regarding the garden/outdoor areas or garage. However, without the subsidy, the money would not initially be invested in the better house but would instead come directly from the personal budget for these items. Accordingly, I see the payment of the subsidy only as a postponement of the payment. If this money did not exist, many would certainly build only a standard house without the additional requirements for KfW and invest the money directly in the outdoor facilities.

no, I wanted to know your special place of residence, which - unlike this shitty yard - must be so intoxicating

In the vicinity, which is why I allow myself this statement ;)

I just read the post several times... You must be confusing something, I couldn't find your wording there ;)

To revisit the topic of housing shortage and subsidies once again. The state is currently even paying demolition premiums. So the need can’t be that great. The large housing cooperatives receive 100 euros per square meter of living space in subsidies when they demolish apartments. Who on earth is supposed to understand that?

What is supposed to be the moral bankruptcy?

That in our country, with all the regulations, laws, and rules that we citizens (rightly) have to comply with, the government simply decrees over the weekend that all those who rely on deadlines, promises, regulations, etc. have to find out that they can no longer expect any support. In my opinion, the moral bankruptcy lies in the lack of trustworthiness, in the lack of reliability, but that is just my personal opinion and I do not hold it against anyone if they see it differently.

To revisit the topic of housing shortage and subsidies once more. The state is even currently paying demolition premiums. So the need can't be that great. The large housing cooperatives receive subsidies of 100 euros per square meter of living space when they demolish apartments. Who on earth is supposed to understand this anymore?

This is easy to understand. For example, in the Ruhr area, there are too many buildings slated for demolition that are no longer fit for renovation. But if construction costs are already so high that new builds are not profitable for the general population (for rent under €10 in new construction, the idea hardly pays off anymore), poor old buildings are no longer addressed. This is the incentive to switch from old to new. Especially in East urban development, which has been ongoing for ages, it was (and is) a targeted subsidy to create affordable housing.

In this respect, many questions about whether it is still possible to apply for KFW 55 funding until the end of the month have probably been resolved. A new budget must now be decided on. Also, whether and how funding should continue. However, this will usually take several months.

Hello Hausbau200, can I contact you in a way other than the messaging function? I would like to send you my documents once.

Best regards