KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

A serious issue is that Munich, for example, now has only just under 3,000 subsidized apartments, while Stuttgart has nearly 30,000. This is an emergency. When families of four live in two-room apartments. And yes, of course, it is a disaster for the affected prospective builders not to be able to build anymore, but the number of affected people is vastly outnumbered by those affected who also do not benefit if some apartments become available due to the construction of single-family houses. Very few builders actually move out of affordable apartments. Political failure was abandoning and selling off social housing. Look up the keyword Bayernheim. It's heartbreaking.

I agree with you, and I think you know that too. But I really feel sorry for the people here. I am glad that we are "only" renovating and not facing new construction at the current time.

Your case is a blatant injustice. Contact some newspaper editorial offices to see if they want to report on your hardship case. But unfortunately, because of the distraction caused by Ukraine, there will not be a great public outcry... Habeck has indeed completely failed here.

Just asking stupidly: so far the general contractor hasn't even gotten in touch yet, would you really go to the press already? I think I wouldn't want to wake any sleeping dogs. Therefore, instead of the press, I would rather have contacted consumer protection.

I assume that most GCs haven't realized that yet. Back then, a clause was written in because it was supposed to be that way, and then they forgot about it. But I firmly believe that this will spread in the next few weeks, on TV or not

Well folks, what does "not understood" and "sleeping dogs" mean - that was not a right of withdrawal but a "resolutive condition". The contracts in question have expired! I would definitely not just sit this out now but start drafting a plan B!

Building Code § 158
(2) If a legal transaction is made under a resolutive condition, the effect of the legal transaction ends when the condition occurs; at that time, the previous legal situation is reinstated.

And what do we do now against this injustice?

First of all: The problem lies in the individual situation of each person. Accordingly, only legal advice and clarification of one's own situation and weighing of the chances of success remain. I consider a class action lawsuit like Dieselgate to be out of the question here.

We will seek legal advice on this matter shortly and then weigh the cost/benefit risk. As people who seek harmony, this whole situation is already unpleasant enough for us, but we agree not to let ourselves be trampled on.

Since stopping the project is only an option when we have given the proverbial last shirt, we will not give up prematurely on any of the fronts (Corona, war, shortage of raw materials, funding, etc.) where the fight is still ongoing.

I consider it, to put it mildly, inappropriate to compare the discontinuation of public funding (even if unannounced) to "kicking it to the ground." Put your energy and money into planning and construction rather than a lawyer and a hopeless legal battle. ...and please reflect on your approach to planning once again. Of course, you can wait until the preferred general contractor has time, but that comes with risks (interest rate increase, loss of funding, price increase) that have unfortunately now occurred in your case. So playing the victim here is not appropriate, if we're being honest...