KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 464

I thought with "EH40-NH" almost everything was already exhausted.

Absolutely not. One problem with the current houses is that we effectively shift the energy demand from operation to construction. But since we only consider operation, this has so far been sugar-coated as "sustainable" and "environmentally friendly."

What could/will still come for single-family home builders?

There are many ideas. Environmentally friendly production of materials, sheep wool and similar as insulation, heating systems where the manufacturer also gives a 30-year guarantee, modular buildings,... In addition, the usual suspects: photovoltaics, green roofs, infiltration I would relatively reliably assume that some kind of CO2 footprint for building materials will come (because this is the only type of pollutant...) and funding will only be granted if certain limits are met. That will probably be the death of the subsidized solid house, because wood will certainly be considered zero in the calculation, similar to how electricity for electric cars comes from the socket.

The "meaning" results from the specification of the BEG.

"However, the conclusion of delivery and service contracts for the subsidized construction services before the application is submitted represents the start of the project and generally precludes funding." Therefore, with this "rescinding condition" in the contract, one can already conclude it before the funding has been applied for. We had to do it quite quickly to still get the company's old conditions. Well, it didn't work. Now we are waiting for the recalculation.

Do I understand correctly that the house builder no longer wants you as a customer, but wants to sell you the same house at a higher price?

Absolutely not. One problem with current houses is that we effectively shift the energy demand from operation to construction. But since we only consider operation, it has so far been sugar-coated as "sustainable" and "environmentally friendly."

There are many ideas. Environmentally friendly production of materials, sheep wool and similar as insulation, heating systems where the manufacturer also provides a 30-year warranty, modular buildings,... Then the usual suspects: photovoltaics, green roofs, infiltration I would quite reliably assume that some kind of CO2 footprint for building materials will come (because that's the only type of pollutant...) and subsidies will only be granted if certain limits are met. That would probably be the death of subsidized solid houses, because wood certainly counts as zero in the calculation, similar to electricity for electric cars coming from the socket.

Material recycling will be a big issue. Less inseparable composite materials, use of recycled concrete aggregate as aggregate, etc.

Do I understand correctly that the house builder no longer wants you as a customer, but wants to sell the same house to you at a higher price?

It was a requirement of the "[B]BMWK" to include this clause in contracts in order to preserve the eligibility of the project for funding even if the contract is concluded BEFORE the application.

This case has now occurred. According to the Building Code, it is not optional. The contract is now void. That this benefits the construction companies in the current situation is another matter.

On the other hand, there are certainly builders who have calculated so tightly that they cannot manage without funding or who are now looking for alternatives. For these, it is of course now also advantageous. One must not forget that.[/B]

But those who had 80k funding in mind can also omit the pseudo granny flat and do KFW55 and come out cost-neutral.

I am of the opinion that it relieves the housing market if the children stay in the pseudo granny flat for a few more years during their studies and do not occupy their own apartment in the city. But certainly there are also counterarguments. (By the way, we are building without a granny flat and deliberately did not orient ourselves to the subsidies or similar when building our house.)

This certainly applies if the parental home is located in the city or is well connected to public transport - which many newer residential areas are not.