Bauhaus concrete villa with core insulation - experiences

  • Erstellt am 2018-09-11 07:32:07

hampshire

2020-04-08 16:00:55
  • #1
Do we need a photovoltaic thread again?
 

guckuck2

2020-04-08 16:10:14
  • #2


Moreover, the whole thing would only make sense if there were, for example, annual expansion limits. Year 1: 100 GWp installed capacity, of which 70 GWp feed-in capable Year 2: an additional 100 GWp added capacity, of which also 70 GWp feed-in capable. Thus, the grid in year 2 would already have to withstand peaks of 140 GWp, whereas only 70 GWp had to be managed the previous year. Why not plan directly with 100 in year 1 and 200 in year 2?

Also here: flatten the curve. Presumably investment protection for grid operators who do not feel the expansion of renewables driven forward by the high Renewable Energy Act support at full force but always with a time delay. Perhaps still economically sensible (no idea, we will probably never find out), unpleasant for the plant operator from a business perspective, absolutely stupid ecologically.
 

11ant

2020-04-08 16:21:33
  • #3
Nevertheless, the official reason for subsidies is the cliimate
 

rick2018

2020-04-08 16:49:34
  • #4
I also find it stupid. And also that I have to pay taxes on the electricity I consume myself from my own system (funded with money taxed multiple times) that I was forced to install... If it weren't like that, we would surely have found a solution to install 30kWp or more to become more self-sufficient.
 

guckuck2

2020-04-08 16:55:22
  • #5


You only have to because you want to.

You can also have the photovoltaic system installed without surplus feed-in, then you are not self-employed. This eliminates income tax on self-consumption. But you also do not receive any proceeds from the sale of electricity.
You can also opt for the small business regulation, then you save the VAT on self-consumption. However, you do not get the input tax from the acquisition refunded.

But this is not worthwhile. That is why 99% do it as a self-employed activity with all the tax benefits (!) that it brings.
 

hampshire

2020-04-08 17:08:10
  • #6
It is an emotional topic. Having to pay the Renewable Energy Act surcharge on the self-consumption of electricity from the roof feels like VAT on self-cooked food. That simply takes the fun out of it for me. I would rather build another system >0.1MWp for full feed-in or in agricultural use as an eco-financial investment - but not on my property at the house, rather on a farm or by a highway / railway track.
 

Similar topics
09.04.2013Is financing a photovoltaic system unprofitable?11
08.12.2014Smaller photovoltaic system 2 KWp11
12.02.2015Photovoltaic systems & storage systems *collective thread*21
05.06.2015Photovoltaic system for hot water preparation and feeding15
20.11.2015Solar / Photovoltaic from an economic perspective53
08.01.2016Photovoltaic system: self-consumption rate with battery and further questions27
23.02.2016Photovoltaic + Battery - Which System - Experiences?17
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family house - experiences39
18.12.2016Introduction to Photovoltaics (New Construction)25
17.05.2017Photovoltaics initially without storage54
20.10.2017Roof with photovoltaic or other investment, any experiences?19
06.02.2018Solar for hot water/heating or better photovoltaic for electricity?21
16.03.2018Economics of Photovoltaics - My Findings - Is Something Missing?65
24.07.2019Energy Saving Ordinance 2016 or KFW 55 for bungalow with air-water heat pump & controlled residential ventilation, optional photovoltaic47
08.01.2020Photovoltaic system with supplementary storage ovens12
10.11.2021Photovoltaic system: Costs, saving potential? - Experiences?240
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
23.04.2023Is preparing for photovoltaics in new construction sensible?81
24.02.2022Photovoltaic system air-water heat pump - profitability single-family house KFW55EE95
02.06.2022Promotion of photovoltaic systems Easter package108

Oben