Bauhaus concrete villa with core insulation - experiences

The logical consequence of this question would be as follows: No ownership, only renting. All in the standardized Murmansk M70 panel building. In a planned city. The question whether really the exact same thing should be built for everyone.

Yes, it was a theoretical question. Personally, I never had the "pleasure" of living in a uniform panel building, but we had some idea of what it means when everyone stirs in the same pot. If I were to measure it by perceived happiness, I cannot say what was really better. The living situation probably has very little influence on that.

I think it's crazy that you have to justify yourself for every little thing in this forum!

How can someone try to impose their opinion on a STRANGER who is just planning their own home and even subtly insult them.

It really takes the fun out of this forum.

I find it crazy that you have to justify yourself for every little thing in this forum!

How can someone try to impose their opinion on a STRANGER who is just planning their own home and even subtly insult them.

It really takes the fun out of this forum.

Yes, the trend of trying to impose one's own opinion on others has clearly intensified recently. Apparently, some people overlook that this is not their house. Certain points from the builders simply have to be accepted (because they are a matter of taste; a consequence of individual needs, etc.). It increasingly annoys me when people have to justify their decisions or are pressured to do so: Decisions by builders do not need justification here in the forum! We also don’t decide what XY has to eat tonight.

The truly meaningful feedback (such as pointing out defects; highlighting disadvantages of a proposed solution; suggesting alternatives that even eliminate disadvantages) is slowly but surely becoming scarce. Different positions and opinions should be brought in – but a TE never, ever has to justify themselves.

Therefore, I can understand that after a few months in the forum, one has "had enough" of dealing with certain statements. Or simply refrains from showing anything at all.

I hope that in the future we can focus again on statements that are helpful to the TE.

I think it's crazy that you have to justify yourself for every little thing in this forum!

How can anyone try to push their opinion on a STRANGER who is just planning their own home and even subtly insult them.

It really takes the fun out of this forum.

What exactly are you talking about now? Children's room, house size, sustainable building?
I actually only see that the discussion has drifted a bit, without anyone dictating or reproaching anything to the other.

WHAT would a DISCUSSION be without these digressions? Everyone is free to think about any topic. From brainstorming, everyone takes out WHAT THEY WANT. If not, if one gets hung up on the unimportant contributions and cannot filter for oneself, then one should avoid discussions.

First: I am looking forward later, hopefully, to pictures of the finished house and now to the fact that the curve was managed, not to ruin the thread with the children detour.

The question of whether everyone should really be built individually.

Quite clearly yes, since a singular standard universal house type is simply not necessary: from a basic quantity of about "x" copies of each house type model, the "natural" (i.e. not consciously controlled by anyone) "chaotic" fluctuation and rotation in the real estate market is completely sufficient, so everyone finds their match even if there are different (soup to Roman) pots of all sizes and colors.

The critical size for this phenomenon is probably around "x" of about one thousand units, so it is guaranteed never to be undershot nationwide and only occasionally concerning small places on a micro scale. Consequently, from a construction economic point of view, it is simply not required that a central committee develops a cookie-cutter universal house with children's room modules.

Friendship!

Yes, the trend of wanting to impose one's own opinion on others has noticeably intensified lately.

There is nothing surprising about this, since the quantities of "forum discussants" and "participants in the development plan process" – both "people like you and me / from the people" – are qualitatively identical. Only that in the development plan later there are eave heights, and in the forum it is "specified" whether in the living-cooking suite a possible partition wall between living and cooking or between living and dining cooking "belongs." (Ceterum censeo, you don’t need a garage side door)