For me, this or such a house simply represents art, which just happens to be habitable. Whether the museum caretaker lives in it or the owner, I don’t really care; I’m happy to be able to see it even in detail through pictures. I don’t need to own it either, like many other things, but I enjoy looking at beautiful things, even if it’s only through pictures as here. If everyone had it, it would lose the appeal of being special; the question of adequate inhabitation for two doesn’t arise at all, especially if you even remotely recognize the meticulousness behind it, the love for detail, the view of the whole, combined with the encyclopedic material knowledge of the builder. With absolute certainty, this reflects the resident’s lifestyle; he ensured that. I can recognize for myself that from the first idea, the courage, the much work and effort to the current result, I wouldn’t have been able to achieve that without feeling even a bit worse about myself or my own tiny living space with a kitchenette.
Especially that in many areas there simply seems to be nothing, an "emptiness," where normally something would immediately be placed, plus the simple, green-framed building with the funny paddling pool, I find pleasant. But I also like empty compartments in cupboards. :D Like just did, I also thank for this absolutely candid and therefore courageous presentation and documentation over such a long period. Unfortunately, in my opinion, this is becoming less and less here, probably also because some painstakingly created threads are simply deleted here or some image posters were so harshly criticized for potential mistakes that they preferred to refrain from posting the next picture. A shame, and well, instead there are even more calculation examples and performance curves for all kinds of stuff :eek:. Oops… just got a message from Paypal about a payment received from @ri….. Ok, fine, amount as agreed, next please….