Floor plan planning shortly before submitting the building application

It's a pity that you were so poorly advised on such a project. We had the architect of the general contractor present in the 2nd planning meeting, who explained everything to us and also planned the windows as we wanted. During the shop drawing planning with the site manager, it was then decided which window should go where. So fixed glazing, tilt or tilt-and-turn. Whether a bar should be in the middle of the double-wing windows, etc. Then the glazing, e.g. in the bathroom with frosted glass, and the barrier-free access at the terrace... Of course, aluminum windows or plastic, wood/aluminum and which color were discussed. The smallest detail then were the handles. Our front door also has a different size than the windows, wider and higher. But you have to move in with that as well. I would attribute your view on the windows to the architect of the general contractor. He is actually responsible for such things. And it was made clear in the 1st meeting who has which task in the company and in the construction process!

At least the three balcony doors should have been planned and executed uniformly according to the dimensions of the left door!

By the way, they were still like that in #388.

Incidentally, I seem to remember that originally there was still much more unrest in the garden facade (in the area of the ground floor).

11ant, but that's not enough to save the planner's reputation.

Here we would have had these narrow glass surfaces along the entire front. From today's perspective, it would even be better if, given the raw building dimensions, there was only one access in the utility room and all the other three elements were at least executed as fixed with wider glass surfaces.

I no longer remember if there was unrest in the garden facade before.

Let's see what else will come up. Same for the kitchen to be redesigned. Probably the upper cabinets will simply be removed and a wall ventilation installed or a ceiling ventilation under a dropped ceiling. It'll be fine. For now, I'm done thinking about selling the place again.

but that’s not enough to restore the planner’s honor.

Well, somehow there had to be a standardization of the measurements (dressing room - bathroom - overall house width - some kind of magical triangle anyway).

For now, I’ve moved away from the idea of selling the place again.

*Chin up* *Thumbs up* and I already said anyway: I certainly won’t buy it from you.

Well, somehow the standardization of the dimensions had to happen (dressing room - bathroom - overall house width - some kind of magical triangle, basically).

This is easy to answer. The utility room had to be made wider due to the second emergency exit. However, this was not discussed; it can only be inferred from the documents.

That the balcony door in the dressing room became a fixed element was our wish. We found it quite pointless to create another door here and incur additional costs for it.

Everything is better than the balcony doors in the bedroom and bathroom – whether it's the fixed element or the utility room door. But enough discussion about that now. It will find its way, and the result must be accepted. Period.

I have a clarifying meeting with the GU tomorrow. I have looked again at which points might still come up in the further process. I came across the exterior plaster. Attached is the relevant excerpt from the construction service description.



Should one perhaps ask exactly which color will be used and possibly order a higher-quality color for an additional charge? For example, Sto Lotusan?

Or can one already expect sufficient quality in the color based on the construction service description and corresponding standards?