Floor plan planning shortly before submitting the building application

  • Erstellt am 2017-10-02 23:25:16

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-01-26 08:36:57
  • #1
During the earthworks, they have now discovered that the demolition contractor apparently left old house foundations standing. They also found construction debris, roots, and concrete residues in the excavation pit. Some of it must be disposed of as Z2 and causes significant additional costs. Unfortunately, this could not be seen at the end of the demolition work, as apparently something was dug over it.

It will surely be difficult to prove this.
 

bau.mal

2018-01-26 10:31:34
  • #2
Try not to always find a deliberately guilty person! Even with new construction, you are not protected from surprises, which is why, among other things, it is advisable to plan reserves for unforeseen events and not to stretch yourself financially to the last euro.
 

kaho674

2018-01-26 10:56:29
  • #3
I see it differently. If I hire a demolition company to tear something down and dispose of it, they can't leave half of it standing and bury the waste directly on the site. The guy deserves to be punished for fraud.
 

bau.mal

2018-01-26 11:15:46
  • #4
I understand that you see it differently ... your selective perception is also interesting ... I do not read anything in the post by the OP that half of the demolition remained on the property, nor in any sentence about buried garbage.
 

matte

2018-01-26 11:21:45
  • #5
Well, I wouldn't see it that simply here either. I don't know the background, but two scenarios come to mind for me right now:

1. The OP bought the property after the demolition, then I would feel fooled in his place and would call the seller.
2. The OP commissioned the demolition themselves, then I would feel fooled in their place and would immediately call the demolition company.

That the OP is interested in finding someone to blame is probably understandable. That he should set aside financial reserves for unexpected events is another matter, but has nothing to do with the issue at hand, not even if he mentions the additional costs.
 

kaho674

2018-01-26 11:51:40
  • #6





Can this be misunderstood?
 

Similar topics
24.07.2013Additional costs due to underfloor heating11
15.03.2015Additional costs for dormer / gable or Frisian gable10
03.12.2019Additional costs due to incorrectly planned ventilation system + floor-to-ceiling windows?50
24.04.2017Buying land without a soil survey?13
27.11.2017Are additional costs for wood-look floor tiles normal?25
22.06.2018Unauthorized high-quality work - additional costs25
03.06.2018Liability issue regarding additional costs of a planning favor12
11.10.2019What to consider when dealing with a rear property?10
14.11.2019Construction contract additional costs foundation reinforcement?10
04.12.2019Are the additional costs for lime plaster instead of gypsum plaster realistic?16
18.04.2020Additional costs for sloped land with tree coverage42
30.05.2020Support hanging and filling - Additional costs?31
01.02.2021Single-family house 159 sqm - Straight plot - Correctly calculated?26
23.01.2021Laying tiles additional costs55
24.01.2021Additional costs for oak stair covering instead of beech – usury?16
21.05.2021Expired fixed price guarantee - additional costs29
09.07.2021First alleged fixed price and now additional costs - legal?79
29.03.2022Single-family house KfW55 - Extra costs: rip-off or justified?29
05.04.2022Feasibility financing new construction (land + semi-detached house or semi-detached half)93
22.02.2023Soil report for bungalow 140 sqm, additional costs for WU concrete?33

Oben