Floor plan planning shortly before submitting the building application

I would also choose the tallest possible Pax with hinged doors on both sides – although on one side I would still fit a dresser at a comfortable working height so that you can quickly fold, fold, or roll a shirt again or place the laundry basket. Above the dresser, I would put a mirror and above that a few shelves.

Sliding doors are nonsense; they need two and a half meters of wardrobe width or more to make sense. That would mean committing to one wardrobe depth per side here. But I would definitely break out of this limited way of thinking: depth about 65 cm, for example, on one side for the back one-eighty and on the other for the back one-twenty, and in front then, for example, dressers on one side and less deep wardrobes on the other.

And I might still put the sliding doors at the "entrance." That way, you won't regret it visually, and behind them you can clearly downgrade the design priority (and "in the worst case" even combine wardrobes and dressers of different provenance).

You mean an open system? Doesn’t all your clothes get covered in dust?

I have lived for years with walk-in closets of various sizes and never had that problem (a dressing room is basically the same). Where would all the dust even come from? You don’t live in the room or iron there. There are also no radiators to stir up the little dust that accumulates. Just vacuum regularly, and it’s fine. Clothes you haven’t used in years, you don’t need anyway.

I am also a fan of clothing in dressers (don't have much that needs to hang), we plan on one side Pax as high as possible with hinged doors and on the other side for example the 6-drawer Malm dressers (they are only 48cm deep and provide some space, for things that don’t go on hangers you simply don’t need the extra 12cm depth). As Fummelbrett said, it is very practical if you also have something where you can put or place something on. For the wardrobe, execute one or two doors with mirrors. Above the dresser you can then also hang a nice picture.

And with the inauguration of my walk-in wardrobe, I switched to hanging everything that is at all possible. This particularly includes T-shirts, blouses, cardigans, etc. And for pants, the pull-out pants rack from Pax. Because I no longer wanted to have several T-shirts stacked on top of each other and then have to dig out the bottom one, but rather because I wanted direct access to every T-shirt. In addition, it preserves the hanger work when you have taken the trouble to do it. When folded, you just create crease marks.

Therefore, I have a total of 275 cm of Pax, consisting of

[*]1m with 2 hanging rods,

[*]1m with 1 hanging rod, 2 drawers for underwear/socks, and 2 plastic boxes with lids for sweaters
[*]75 cm with 1 hanging rod and 1 pull-out pants rack,

[*]above that another shelf. Such a shelf could also be placed on sliding rails and would then have a surface for laying things out.
[*]Also, an old 50 cm Pax wardrobe that I use for hanging long items, coats, dresses, etc.

[*]and 1x Billy shelf .. for bed linen, etc.
[*]everything without doors, except for the old 50 cm wardrobe, which had a door
[*]Instead, in front of my wardrobe niche just a sliding curtain, so I don’t have to look into the dark doorway.
[*]Dust really remains limited, and if something does get dusty, it is a sign that you actually don’t need the item anymore because you don’t wear it often enough.

Personally, 1m would be too cramped for me – I don't like jumping into my socks between two such "walls." If the space requirement is almost met with 1 tall cabinet, then on the other side there would only be a sideboard for the socks and a mirror on the wall above it.

If it turns out to be rather tight for the clothes, I would probably choose 2 cabinets each 50cm deep, so that there are at least 1.20m between the cabinets. You can notice the difference. It is also conceivable to have one side 60 and the other only 40, and so on.