Floor plan planning shortly before submitting the building application

  • Erstellt am 2017-10-02 23:25:16

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-07-09 11:23:32
  • #1
The work plan signed by me vs. the work plan that is now circulating. I think this looks good for me.

10.1.


23.3.


I don’t know that I approved this and it doesn’t make any sense to draw the ceiling breakthrough longer if at the same time the monstrosity running along the wall keeps the previous dimensions.
 

matte

2018-07-09 11:29:46
  • #2
Um, I can't follow you. On both variants, a surface-mounted installation can be guessed, as no wall chases or similar are indicated. The longer DD in the second version doesn't change that either. I suspect it was made longer so that the ELT strand still fits through. To me, it initially looks like it was built exactly as contained in the plan and approved by you. :/
 

R.Hotzenplotz

2018-07-09 11:31:43
  • #3
With a larger ceiling opening, the cable routing to the right also becomes larger, doesn't it?
 

matte

2018-07-09 11:35:22
  • #4
No. Because the breakthrough does not say anything about the routing of the pipes. A pipe routing is indicated, but does not differ in the 2 versions. That is why my assumption is that the depth of the DD was only increased because of other trades (ELT) not entered in the plan. As indicated, the wastewater pipe comes out of the ceiling, then runs UNDER the ceiling to the right into the corner and goes down there until it penetrates the floor slab. Just as shown in the picture from you.
 

kbt09

2018-07-09 12:04:29
  • #5
I find the position of the exhaust vent strange. That is not supposed to be for the [Dunstabzugshaube] - right? If yes, then do not execute it like that.
 

11ant

2018-07-09 13:11:58
  • #6

Not quite, but up to the window reveal. Wasn't there supposed to be a bistro table at the corner window earlier?


By not having seen a kitchen brochure in a long time, and understandably not thinking of "Bauhaus" on the inside with a hipped roof.


The guests of the housewarming party will see the house fully made up and will admire it. But saying goodbye will not be difficult if — probably even before the school enrollment — someone makes a good offer for the house.


Well, not entirely without reason: the kitchen was once to be under the garage-side child’s room, and then this pipe ran through the guest WC (probably with the DD 40/20 to meet the ventilation).

I could say maliciously: such a house is the punishment for wrong priorities (five-meter eighty home cinema viewing distance as priority 1, roof terrace with laundry rack corner balcony, etc.). And I remain certain: the rear garage door because of the mini excavator will have been driven through once for every thousand euros it costs when you sell the house again.

As the ironic twist of history, the buyer will make an intermediate door to the garage — not where it is "pre-installed thanks to me," but a meter next to it or so.


A finished house would have had no more or fewer deviations from the dream model overall either. But it would probably have been at least one energy saving ordinance older, with somewhat less fuss about the consequences of the recessed mailbox for the world climate.
 
Oben