Floor plan planning shortly before submitting the building application

Using the example of the windows at the front on the upper floor: my suggestion of the wider "post" between two windows would be a typical Tektur issue, patching the entire window front from an earlier design stage, but this should be done before submitting the application.

I have suggested to them to plan it as you proposed. In case of doubt, I decide in favor of the advantages of the interior versus the exterior appearance.

This question certainly has the same significance in the living room.

In the living room, you probably mean my idea to move the window to the right of the dining table, which still needs to be drawn there, upwards. Based on the advice here, I have abandoned that idea and leave it as currently drawn.

I told them to try planning it the way you suggested.

My proposal was a minimally invasive solution in order not to drastically change the latest status. I would prefer returning to the previous window arrangement. However, these are two approaches, and in my opinion, you should decide on one and have only that "replanned."

In the living room, you probably mean my idea to move the window to the right of the dining table, which is yet to be drawn there, upwards.

No, I could imagine that after the "final" furnishing, taking into account the actual sofa dimensions, the garden-side dining area window and the sliding door might still swap places. I consider this something that needs to be clarified significantly before anything is considered ready for submission.

I would prefer a return to the previous window handling. However, these are two approaches, and in my opinion, you should choose one and only have that one "replanned."

I was not aware of it that way. I rather understood you as saying, what on earth did the planner think when designing the previous window? I had seen that as not an option at all. Apparently a big misunderstanding.

No, I could imagine that after the "final" furnishing, taking the actual sofa dimensions into account, the garden-side dining room window and the sliding door might still swap places. I think that should be clarified significantly before considering something as already ready for application.

Such significant things, of course, come very late now. It hadn't occurred to me so far and I do not see an advantage in it now either. At some point, one must also finalize a plan, I think.

The general contractor told me again today that there is definitely 120 cm of space between the two closets in the dressing room. I can rely on that. He assumes a closet depth of 60 cm.

He aims to conclude the contract this month, as it will otherwise be more expensive for us.

What was going through the planner's mind with the previous window design that he planned something like that?

... but referred to the latest design, where the small window of Child 2 "sticks to the partition wall" and forms a "unit" with the bathroom window. The window arrangement (seen from outside) "big-small-big-small" with room for a wardrobe on this wall for Child 2 (= in #16 "old window logic") I consider better, and that was also how I perceived it as the "majority view." But I can live with "my" solution as well - if I had considered it only barely sufficient, I would not have suggested it.

At some point, you have to finalize a plan, I think.

If necessary, by taking the living room as it is like a tenant and then aligning the next sofa to the house. I think with one (or the other) window change mentioned above and the adjustment of the parapet height, we are on the home stretch.

... referred to the latest draft, where the small window of Child 2 "sticks to the partition wall" and forms the "unit" with the bathroom window. The window arrangement (seen from outside) "large-small-large-small" with room for a wardrobe on this wall at Child 2 (= in #16 "old window logic") I consider better, and that’s also how I perceived it as the "majority view".

Annoying; then I have now told him the wrong thing. In hindsight, I actually quite liked the previous intermediate version. But I understood it as if you found it bad. Stupid.

If necessary, taking the living room as it is like a tenant and then orienting the next sofa towards the house.

At the moment, I don’t see what moving the sliding door should bring? In the old thread, several people expressed that this division is desirable because the path from the kitchen leads straight into the garden. The sliding door was previously on the other side and was moved at all for the aforementioned reason.

I think, with one (or the other) window change above and with the parapet height adjustment, we are heading for the home stretch.

Yes, I want to finalize it now as well. The parapet height will be adjusted by everyone. The window issue will also still be resolved.

I’m posting it again for everyone. Would this be a feasible window plan on the first floor?