I received feedback today regarding the furniture layout. This is part of the execution planning.
That is nonsense, even if some have always done it that way. A submission plan is a draft, not just a preliminary draft in the design scale. After that, there are revisions – plans are "reworked" again, typically because of something like the garage intermediate door here, or a wardrobe niche is inserted, or the drainage of the toilet, door, and shower changes direction, or the retractable stairs are relocated, or a kitchen corner window suddenly gets a post. But, for example, swapping the positions of the sliding door and window opening in the living room because the actual measurements of the client's sofa do not fit where the example sofa is shown in the plan – those are changes that should no longer be necessary. Using the example of the windows at the front on the upper floor: my suggestion of a wider "post" between two windows would be such a typical revision issue; patching the entire window front from an earlier design status, however, should be done
before the application is submitted. And here is your main reason for this "other change," that it makes a significant difference for a cupboard on that wall in Child 2’s room. This question certainly has the same dimension in the living room.