Why don't construction prices go down?

(...)
FDP and CDU probably won't go along with that. but it doesn't matter at all. The welfare state is finished!

The FDP can't be stupid enough to provoke new elections in the current situation. Unless Lindner wants to use his last five political minutes to put his signature under a coalition agreement with the racists.

Sorry. Mr. Glaser from the AfD (...)

Is that the CO2 denier whom no one wanted as Vice President of the Bundestag?

(...) what use do we have for a constitutional court if one cannot sue over constitutional laws.

Does this then also apply to the rulings regarding climate protection and CO2 reduction? Or only when it suits the AfD and its supporters? ;)

Don't fool yourself. The government is finished. The climate transformation is not affordable. The FDP will not return to the Bundestag and the AfD is likely to march towards 30 percent. More or less.

It will now become very painful and Germany's economic future is at stake. There will be very unpleasant scenes. We have the choice between the lesser of two evils. Severe cuts to the social system or the printing press with devastating inflation. I tend more towards the latter. I doubt that any kind of new government will be able to bring itself to social cuts. Germany's internal peace would be extremely endangered.

It remains exciting.

Application dated 26.01.2022 from the AfD parliamentary group in the German Bundestag printed matter 20/488.

Draft law on the determination of a second supplementary budget to the federal budget plan for the fiscal year 2021 (Second Supplementary Budget Act 2021) The Bundestag shall decide:

I. The German Bundestag determines: The Second Supplementary Budget Act 2021 clearly violates fundamental, constitutionally anchored principles of budgetary law. This was also the result of the hearing of the Budget Committee on January 10, 2022.

The majority of the legal experts there concluded that the second supplementary budget 2021 is not covered by the Basic Law. The constitutional concerns are as follows in detail: 1. The second supplementary budget 2021 is only passed in 2022. Although the wording of § 33 BHO was complied with by the submission in 2021, legal literature is almost unanimous in the opinion that § 33 BHO must be interpreted in accordance with the constitution to mean that a supplementary draft must be passed by parliament by the end of the year.1 This follows from the constitutional principle of annuality (Art. 110 para. 2 GG) and the budgetary principle of maturity (§ 11 BHO). Especially for newly created positions that can factually only be filled in 2022, it is incomprehensible how these can be part of the 2021 budget plan.

This is exactly how the Federal Constitutional Court sees it as well. An amateur drama group.

Given the current situation, namely that the federal government is missing tens of billions of euros, already made commitments cannot remain valid.
Thank-you letters can be addressed to one or more of the 197 Union members of parliament who have sued in Karlsruhe.

That is nonsense. Tens of thousands of euros in funding are still being paid out daily.

The Union is responsible for many things, but for this, the chancellor actor and his puppet theater are responsible.