Why don't construction prices go down?

(...)
The citizens would go crazy “if they see that 300,000 asylum seekers are rejected, do not leave the country, and receive full benefits.” He added: “They sit at the doctor's and have their teeth redone, while the German citizens next to them can't get appointments.
(...)

In the case of that desperate populism, I would guess Michi Kretschmer, who has been trying to fight the AfD for years by appearing even more extreme in his theses than the AfD itself.
PS:
Oh look, I wasn’t that far off. It was Mittelstand-Merz, income millionaire and hobby pilot... basically the middle class par excellence, who among you doesn’t have a Cessna parked outside?

One reason why Chrupalla is more likely to become chancellor than Merz. Those who want to vote far-right, vote far-right and not far-right light.

Are construction prices actually going down again? :cool:

If you are no longer allowed to quote reputable newspapers or online portals without understanding the exact background and calculations behind the statements...

One is allowed a lot. But even a reputable newspaper is not a good source, as it is at best secondary, usually not even that.

One is allowed to do a lot. But even a reputable newspaper is not a good source, as it is at best secondary, mostly not even that.

Then you are only allowed to claim what you have professionally recalculated and verified yourself. So in the end... almost nothing anymore... because in 95% of the areas in which you discuss, you are simply not an expert. Nowadays, you can't be an expert in everything anymore...

And with that, the whole world comes to a standstill, because I can no longer tell a customer "We achieve xyz in the control loop"... because as soon as he asks me "Did YOU verify that yourself?" I would have to say "No, my colleagues did that..."

And that would make it void, because the colleagues could have cheated and I don't know better...

That would be the end of the world we live in... please do not fight the AfD by doubting reputable sources that are cited by AfD followers just because they don't fit your agenda... that would be my request...

PS: By the way, I am appalled how many fall for the AfD by having AfD followers take reputable reports, cite them... and the rest of the world says "NO, THAT'S NOT TRUE!!!" just because an AfD follower cites it. I hope the AfD will not claim tomorrow that 2 x 3 = 6... because then you would have to deny that too. Then we are really bankrupt, in every respect.

Well, actually yes. He cited absolutely reputable sources that report such prices.

1. No, he cited sources (newspaper reports etc.) in which things like "up to..." are stated, I have even read the sources completely
2. No, he did not mention a single figure related to the new construction of district heating networks. He stated house connection costs to existing networks, operating costs of district heating at the customer, etc.

Also to you, please read carefully.

then Karsten, you better step out quickly here too, because as far as I understand, you are a banker and not a mechanical engineer specializing in supply engineering...

That is the advantage of the banker. He does not need such a degree at all. Why? Because he has customers who rent out tens of thousands of apartments with district heating and are very close to the municipal utilities and local/district heating providers. THEY have accurate data and figures and know what costs will come to the company. Apart from that, I have not engaged in cost discussions at all, but merely (rightfully) criticized the sources or rather their content. If I ask you what time it is, and you answer "green," I cannot appropriately criticize your answer either.

because as soon as he asks me "Did YOU verify that yourself?" I would have to say "No, my colleagues did that..."

Wrong. An invoice from a colleague is a primary source.

But the client throws you out if you say: "At one point, it said that someone calculated it that way."

I don't have to rediscover the theory of relativity myself, Einstein as a source is enough. But not an article by a journalist who once read a biography of Einstein.

And it's not about permission, but about seriousness. You may be unprofessional at will.