Why don't construction prices go down?

Correct, the established parties, however, are completely empty in terms of content and additionally deliberately act against the will of the citizens (migration) and are running our country down completely with more bureaucracy and redistribution, instead of addressing the causes.

Migration in general is not the problem. That is deeply right-wing ideology when migration is simply viewed as a whole and everyone is lumped together. There are types of migration – skilled labor immigration, for example – of which we have such a severe shortage that we have to advertise ourselves abroad. And the AfD slogan "more pimpering" doesn’t help there at all, that’s a 1950s worldview that women should stay at home and bear children again. Other forms of migration are subject to the Geneva Convention and cannot be changed. Where there is war, there will be flight. But what is a problem: when a bus full of asylum seekers comes here across the border, of whom maybe 10% have a prospect of getting asylum after an initial assessment – but the mayor comments in an interview that they still have to build these container cities (containers), because even those without a prospect of asylum will stay here for several years since it takes that long for the process to be completed: that’s where I see the problem. We have a bureaucratic problem. It cannot be that asylum seekers have to wait here for years whether asylum is granted or not – especially when it partially concerns 90% of arrivals. That again creates hardship cases. If I have established myself in a society after 5 years and then I am supposed to be deported again – because I was never supposed to stay? It must be possible to speed up the process.

The Greens mean well with the energy transition but have zero understanding of the economy and the underlying principles. They act without concept and answers but purely ideologically and hostile to science (I don't understand nuclear power because I studied social sciences, the physicists don't have it under control, extremely dangerous!!!!!)

You do realize that this stuff radiates for so long that there are committees dealing with which pictograms should be placed on nuclear waste containers/storages so that potentially future civilizations following us can understand that the stuff is dangerous and should definitely not be touched? The stuff radiates so long that it must be assumed it will outlast us as a civilization. Many want cheap nuclear power, but nobody wants the final repository next door (what is even suitable as a final repository?). Söder style.

Migration in general is not the problem. It is deeply right-wing thinking to simply look at migration as a whole and lump everyone together. There are types of migration – skilled labor immigration, for example – of which we have such a severe shortage that we have to advertise abroad for ourselves.

Totally agree, I work in the technology sector. Yes, we need exactly that kind of immigration, but the bureaucratic hurdles for people who want to work are endlessly high. What my colleagues from India, Pakistan, Turkey who are here tell me... And do you know what else they say: I am unsure if I will stay in Germany – in my home country (Pakistan) I can afford a top-class life with the job, whereas in Germany it’s enough for much less. If my wife weren’t German, I would go back (came to Germany at 8 years old). Of course, issues like war and so on aren’t fully considered here, then the picture changes again. But the general tenor is: performance doesn’t pay off – and that must NOT be the case. Two of my Turkish colleagues are not considering emigrating to Germany but are going straight to Canada (better green card system for highly qualified people). Oh, and the people who immigrate (asylum seekers) unfortunately often are not the ones with the qualifications and added value for Germany that we need, nor are all necessarily affected by war or persecution.

You do realize that this stuff radiates for so long that there are committees working on which pictograms could be placed on nuclear waste containers/at storage sites to make it clear to potentially future civilizations that this stuff is dangerous and should definitely not be touched? This stuff radiates so long that one has to assume it will outlast us as a civilization. Many want cheap nuclear power, but no one wants the final repository in their backyard (what is even suitable as a final repository?), Söder-style.

I am firmly convinced that humanity will populate the solar system in 200, maybe 300 years and will have high technology to solve what will then be trivial problems. Until then, we will store it in Siberia or in disused mines away from the population. Looking back at where humanity stood 200 years ago and where we are now – absolute madness. I only hope that this continues and that we do not regress to an age of wind power but continue to develop high technology and work on scientific excellence. With taboo ideas like nuclear = universally bad, we as a civilization will not make any progress at all.

I find it fascinating how similar the construction cost discussion threads are in terms of content. :-)

I am firmly convinced that humanity will populate the solar system in 200 maybe 300 years and have high technology to solve what then will be trivial problems. Until then, we store it in Siberia or in no longer used mines away from the population.
Looking back at where humanity stood 200 years ago and where we are now - absolute madness.
I just hope that it continues this way and that we do not fall back into a wind power age but continue to develop high technology and work on scientific excellence. With thinking bans like nuclear = categorically evil, we as a civilization will not progress in any way.

Believing does not mean knowing.
So you are simply pushing the problem onto the next generations.
If at some point a solution becomes available, they can reactivate nuclear power again.

Migration in general is not the problem. It is deeply right-wing ideology to simply view migration as a whole and lump everyone together. There are types of migration – skilled labor immigration, for example – of which we have so remarkably few that we have to advertise abroad for ourselves.

Which is exactly the problem. Only the far right seemingly has an issue with qualified migration, meaning people who speak German, work diligently here, earn good money, and contribute to the social systems. Unfortunately, the majority of migration is precisely the opposite: unqualified, without language skills, and thus recipients of social benefits for many years, which have to be financed by others. However, particularly left of center politics often deny this difference and act as if our skilled labor problem could be solved with uncontrolled migration. Qualified migration requires control over who comes into the country, and that is only people who have skills currently considered useful. The population understands the difference.