No, storage systems are generally not recommended. They are economically nonsense, as they are still far too expensive (currently about a factor of 3 away from profitability) and ecologically bad, because they have to be produced with great effort and the stored amount of electricity PLUS the charging losses PLUS the operating losses are not available on the grid to displace coal power.
Addendum (after my objection about the factor of 3 etc.):
In the overall ecological calculation, I agree that not every storage system has a good overall ecological balance (similar to e-cars). This depends on the manufacturers and, at a higher level, on legislators.
Couldn’t the charging and operating losses (depending on the storage-inverter combination, a few to (rather rare) double-digit percent) simply be combined and focus on the additional loss in the chain photovoltaic->battery->AC after conversion compared to photovoltaic->AC, since the normal case is direct consumption. So if 5% are additionally lost through the battery, that would be about 0.2 - 0.5 kWh, somewhere around 1-2% of the photovoltaic surplus in sunshine.
Regarding displacement of coal power: What are the exact numbers here? Large solar farms and still a majority of private existing systems do not use batteries at all: And private households can only store a part during sunshine anyway – so they will continue to feed in a lot – while at night they do not require the nighttime electricity mix (which still contains a lot of lignite and hard coal -> see live data).