Construction progress: Duplex with WU basement and developed attic

I really hope that the offers and the correspondence, on the basis of which a contractual relationship with you was established, were formulated differently. Otherwise, you would really have to be assigned a significant portion of the blame.

: Please write again about what you mean here. What is this blame nonsense supposed to be? I have a general contractor, whoever is commissioned by him for the scaffolding is their business! And even if it’s the biggest idiot for whom spelling is apparently a foreign word. I have neither an offer from the scaffolder nor any other contractual relationship with him. So please don’t post any blanket blame crap here if you don’t know the connections.

And even if he's the last idiot for whom spelling is apparently a foreign word.

Owning property is sometimes more blissful than knowing that it is actually spelled without an "h." I like working with dyslexics: secondly, they are often more focused when sorting out the details than the nerds who get distracted by spelling, and first of all, "dyscalculia with letters" is harmless in bookkeeping matters. And that's what matters to the businessman considerably more.

Can you please explain this alleged "shared guilt" to me?

He probably means the note on the scaffolding. It is written in terrible German and style.

So I now always address the scaffold personally, since I now know that its name is Willi. I've also thought about making a song out of it with the title: "I'll build you a scaffold that bears your name". But until then, I tell everyone that no one is allowed to go on it anymore.

Surely means the note on the scaffolding. It is written in terrible German and style.

That may be, but what "shared guilt" do I have if someone is not proficient in German spelling and expression? In my opinion, one should be very cautious with accusations if one has no understanding of the context. And here I am exactly at the point where I have stopped this as well as the previous thread on the same topic several times, because I am extremely allergic to such stupid, incoherent claims.

Back to the topic: So after changing lawyers and the new expert report not taking place, but with more and more visible defects, the new lawyer came to the construction site a week ago with a friendly architect to get an idea. It ended with the words that his client was too stupid to walk and that the matter was undisputed. The architect took note again of all the defects found so far, including those already mentioned in the expert report, and promised a renovation concept with a cost estimate for Monday. This then arrived and blew me away. Just the defects contained in the TÜV report had already been estimated at €100,000. In this one, the defect repair costs had just shrunk down and were listed at a total of just under €42,000!!!!! And the friendly opposing lawyer even added that they agreed that this could also be done for a maximum of €35,000. If only I had met those two earlier, they would have built the entire semi-detached house for less than half the price. They must have such cheap companies on hand, you could even get a discount. I then spoke on the phone for 2 hours on Tuesday with my lawyer, who unfortunately could not come to the construction site appointment due to quarantine, and we ripped the whole thing apart. Unfortunately, the Dipl.-Ing. made massive mistakes in quantities and prices. He stated the interior walls at 15 m² for 600 m² of living and usable space, the drywall at 150 m² simply instead of 380 m² double layered, the roof at 200 instead of 320 m², the craftsman hour at €38 gross. The removal of screed in all 4 bathrooms, reduction of insulation, change of underfloor heating and relaying of screed again he stated in total at €1,300 and completely left out the window replacement. And for that, he still gets a whole bunch of money. Disgusting!