The whole thing is just pathetic anyway. But I don't want to complain, otherwise the "it's your own fault" comments will come again, which I am more than tired of.
Which contractual relationship is being referred to here? Client/General Contractor or General Contractor/Subcontractor?
Why is there always reference to contractual fulfillment? Does the construction performance description or the work and execution planning deviate from the contractual documents?
He is going bankrupt anyway, don’t you think? Then you’ll be left with the costs again...
He can’t. Otherwise, he would have done so long ago. He is not a GmbH and is therefore liable with his private assets. And since he owns real estate, there is at least something to get there. Whether they are already encumbered, I don’t know.