Construction progress: Duplex with WU basement and developed attic

But do you really believe that my way of communicating had any influence on the non-compliance with the settlement, the delayed insolvency of GU1, the company burial, the mediation of an incompetent company by the lawyer, the butcher’s incompetence, etc.? Do you think that 3 companies are going down here because of my difficult manner? That makes me afraid of myself.

Without any apparent current reason??? No, I said, subliminally. Your comments in the past have sometimes been very nasty and you hint at it here as well. ....... I also have questions, but I don’t ask them because 1. I don’t want to spoil the mood..... And your next comments complete the whole thing. You know what, this discussion has nothing to do with the actual topic anymore. We both find each other silly and that will not change. We don’t need to discuss this further here. What matters to me is to completely finish both houses and resolve my legal disputes. [B]How complete your picture of me is, I don’t care at all.[/B]

In reality, you’d probably drink a cold blonde beer together in the pub and be best buddies :-)

In reality, you would probably be drinking a cold blonde in the pub and be best buddies :-)

Maybe, maybe not. I find discussions to be beneficial and can usually separate opinions from sympathies. I often find people who do not share my opinion to be pleasant nonetheless. Religious or political extremists I take as an example here. To I believe (!) the hunt for a bargain and your absolute manner in your argumentation and opinion have favored the situation(s). We only ever know your side of the stories here. But even if I think that you share some blame for the situation, that does not mean I wish this situation on you. I do not wish it on anyone in the first place. Especially since I do not know you personally. Regarding the attack mode, I would like to say that even if it was/is appropriate in your examples, it is not necessary here at all. Not at any time. Generally, I would claim that basically no one here means you any harm or wishes you ill. Many with opinions different from yours perhaps only want to broaden your perspective, outside of your attack mode.

I would like to add about the attack mode that even if it was/ is appropriate in your examples, it is not necessary here at all. At no time. In general, I would like to claim that basically no one here wishes you any harm. Many with a different opinion than you may only want to broaden your perspective, outside your attack mode.

I see that quite differently now. I was personally attacked here in the forum, it went way below the belt, also by you. That no one wishes me any harm, okay. But there was everything from schadenfreude to horrible prophecies. I have often written that I do not want any advice because it was clear to me that there was only one way. Again, there were indignant comments about that. Why can't some accept that you don't want that. I was constantly in the position of having to justify myself and only kept writing because I was asked to, and promptly the hail of criticism started again. You don't have to like how and what I do, but it will not change anything about my approach, and you will not change my view on the things I have been dealing with for over 4 years now. Of course, I am not on bad terms with everyone involved in the construction. I still get along well with the managing director of the 3rd company, and I even got a lawyer for the 2nd general contractor. If that were the case, there would hardly be any craftsmen on site now. I become unpleasant when people want to make a fool of me.

Great lawyer! I want to claim that he tricked both of us (me and the CEO).

Wait a minute, this lawyer mediated a bit (and negotiated the price down for you!), but in the end you signed a contract with a construction company (the CEO). Isn't it completely irrelevant how the communication took place among this trio? What relevance does that have?

The lawyer was already aware of the previous course of events. This raises the question for me of how he could recommend a painting company with 4 employees as a general contractor, which was already on the brink of bankruptcy at the time the contract was awarded and whose managing director has several negative entries and that is neither personnel-wise nor professionally capable of carrying out the contract. Why does he push a completely realistic price down by 40,000 € without my consent or request? With this price, it was bound to go wrong. In my opinion, that was not above board. He is now denying everything. I could imagine that our user association was a means to an end to drive this company into insolvency, for whatever reason. The lawyer and the shareholder are apparently close friends, and the shareholder had problems with the managing director but could not fire him because only the latter had a master craftsman’s certificate. What do I know. What made me suspicious was the massive denial of this contact being established.