Construction progress: Duplex with WU basement and developed attic

  • Erstellt am 2021-01-04 14:44:59

Hausbau0815

2022-07-20 00:14:14
  • #1
The lawyer was already aware of the previous course of events. This raises the question for me of how he could recommend a painting company with 4 employees as a general contractor, which was already on the brink of bankruptcy at the time the contract was awarded and whose managing director has several negative entries and that is neither personnel-wise nor professionally capable of carrying out the contract. Why does he push a completely realistic price down by 40,000 € without my consent or request? With this price, it was bound to go wrong. In my opinion, that was not above board. He is now denying everything. I could imagine that our user association was a means to an end to drive this company into insolvency, for whatever reason. The lawyer and the shareholder are apparently close friends, and the shareholder had problems with the managing director but could not fire him because only the latter had a master craftsman’s certificate. What do I know. What made me suspicious was the massive denial of this contact being established.
 

Hausbau0815

2022-07-20 08:08:26
  • #2
I will try to explain another example where I believe I am not responsible for the course of events, but it simply has to do with massive laziness combined with incompetence: GU1 entered into a court settlement with us in September 2019, but did not fulfill it, instead selling his company in December 2019. Subsequently, the court ordered a prepayment from this successor company to us in the amount of €129,000, which we will never receive because this company is a shell company. I reported GU1 in March 2020 for fraud in entering into the agreement and for delaying insolvency. Four weeks ago, the public prosecutor’s office in Halle sent a letter stating that the investigations were being discontinued. I then filed an objection and outlined all the reasons again. Now the response from the General Public Prosecutor’s Office also came that the investigations were discontinued. The reasoning: Mr. Z. was already dismissed as managing director in May 2019 and is therefore not liable for the very real delay in insolvency, as this existed continuously only from November 2019. This decision refers to a piece of paper dated 31.05.2019 on which Mr. Z. declared his dismissal. But how then can he enter into a settlement with us in September, sign invoices, emails, obstruction reports in November, and terminate the construction contract with the managing director in December? The General Public Prosecutor replies: apparently the old letterheads and the automatic signature were still used. Are you serious? This dismissal was notarized on 30.12.2019 by the notary, coinciding with the company sale. Strange, isn’t it? The commercial register also dates this change as of 30.12.2019. And exactly until then he is responsible for his mess. But not with our judiciary. I have a letter from his lawyer to me from September 2019. It states that she represents the company XXXX, represented by its managing director Mr. Z. How can that be? Wasn’t he supposedly dismissed already for four months? Or did she not know yet? Pure mockery, and he gets away with it because our judiciary is simply too stupid to understand the simplest connections. But woe to the little fare dodger. Next failure: my then lawyer. He sent me the “burial documents” and should have acted against this back then. But he didn’t. We will now reassess the whole situation. However, logically again associated with new costs.
 

Tassimat

2022-07-20 08:17:28
  • #3
Yes, everything is very bad and incompatible with any sense of justice in this world.

About the lawyer: Even if he wouldn't deny it, it's just hard to prove. High chance of losing a legal dispute.
Regarding insolvency delay: You say you want to reopen the whole thing: Is that even possible anymore? Can you sue indefinitely? In the end, you have another case with new costs. Crazy.

At least you are privileged enough to afford endless legal disputes. Most people, myself included, would have had to give up long ago for purely financial reasons.
 

Tolentino

2022-07-20 09:30:49
  • #4
Car, going golfing or complaining... Everyone has their own hobby.
SCNR

Dear Congratulations on finishing your houses. You did it! Enjoy that!
Especially considering your health description, I am worried. We don’t know each other personally, but if we did, I would probably scold you properly but kindly over a glass of wine or five, and then hug you so hard that maybe you could redirect your focus to something else.
Try to concentrate your strength and energy now on moving and setting up the houses. Enjoy your children and possibly grandchildren.
You yourself say that you probably won’t see any of the money again. So why throw good money after bad?
Calm down. This is a kindly meant advice. Of course, you can still do whatever you want, I don’t judge you.
:)
 

Hausbau0815

2022-07-20 11:27:40
  • #5


This really has nothing to do with justice anymore. Even experts who deal with legal disputes every day have confirmed to me that this is not comprehensible at any point. The mentioned action is not yet a lawsuit, but an objection against the decision of the General Prosecutor's Office. However, from this point on it is only possible through a lawyer, thus with costs.

Privileged? I don’t know. I wouldn’t call it that. More like a pronounced justice fanatic. Unfortunately, money can only be spent once, so it must be saved elsewhere.
 

Hausbau0815

2022-07-20 11:40:29
  • #6
Thanks, Tolentino, and a big hug back. I would rather go for the 5 glasses, since unfortunately alcohol consumption has increased during this time, whereas before it was an absolute exception. Honestly, I can't even imagine how it will be when all this here is finally finished and over. Surely I have other hobbies too, but this task here is already filling the days. Moving and furnishing is not happening for now. My daughter and her family have been living in house 1 since December, and house 2 will probably be rented out, since my son has moved to Münster and will stay there for the time being. My two sons still living with us think we should move into house 2 and have our house here renovated. But they can forget it. Not again! Maybe I'll start a handicraft circle then ;).
 

Similar topics
16.05.2014Moving coming up? What to consider when choosing a moving company15
04.07.2015House contract with financing condition, lawyer wanted10
24.02.2019Moving into the house - furniture, moving, setting up91
21.07.2020Lawyer wanted to sue the construction company52
14.11.2019Scheduling apartment handover and moving20
11.04.2020Construction law - hire a lawyer or not yet16
28.09.2020Marking furniture for the move - How did you do it?20
15.01.2021Moving - have you arranged for amenities?11
13.10.2022National move - long distance - how to find a moving company?108
15.02.2022Financing outdoor facilities, carport, equipment32
28.06.2024Building permit - is a lawyer useful?12

Oben