I will try to explain another example where I believe I am not responsible for the course of events, but it simply has to do with massive laziness combined with incompetence: GU1 entered into a court settlement with us in September 2019, but did not fulfill it, instead selling his company in December 2019. Subsequently, the court ordered a prepayment from this successor company to us in the amount of €129,000, which we will never receive because this company is a shell company. I reported GU1 in March 2020 for fraud in entering into the agreement and for delaying insolvency. Four weeks ago, the public prosecutor’s office in Halle sent a letter stating that the investigations were being discontinued. I then filed an objection and outlined all the reasons again. Now the response from the General Public Prosecutor’s Office also came that the investigations were discontinued. The reasoning: Mr. Z. was already dismissed as managing director in May 2019 and is therefore not liable for the very real delay in insolvency, as this existed continuously only from November 2019. This decision refers to a piece of paper dated 31.05.2019 on which Mr. Z. declared his dismissal. But how then can he enter into a settlement with us in September, sign invoices, emails, obstruction reports in November, and terminate the construction contract with the managing director in December? The General Public Prosecutor replies: apparently the old letterheads and the automatic signature were still used. Are you serious? This dismissal was notarized on 30.12.2019 by the notary, coinciding with the company sale. Strange, isn’t it? The commercial register also dates this change as of 30.12.2019. And exactly until then he is responsible for his mess. But not with our judiciary. I have a letter from his lawyer to me from September 2019. It states that she represents the company XXXX, represented by its managing director Mr. Z. How can that be? Wasn’t he supposedly dismissed already for four months? Or did she not know yet? Pure mockery, and he gets away with it because our judiciary is simply too stupid to understand the simplest connections. But woe to the little fare dodger. Next failure: my then lawyer. He sent me the “burial documents” and should have acted against this back then. But he didn’t. We will now reassess the whole situation. However, logically again associated with new costs.