Has the professional association blocked the scaffold during self-performance?

Now there are concrete details. The lawyer for construction law was called and he says that the builders may go on the scaffold and roof at their own risk, regardless of what the [BG] says. Of course, excluded are the construction helpers who are insured through the [BG]; they are naturally not allowed to work there.

Then everything is fine, just make sure that no one else can simply use the scaffolding and that's that. Olli

It has now been discussed with the construction law attorney and he says that the builders may go on scaffolding and roof at their own risk regardless of what the BG says.

It would be interesting to know if a social law attorney would have the same opinion. In my opinion, the ingenuity of chambers, social funds and so on, up to the renamed GEZ, to broaden their compulsory membership base, has long exceeded the limits of solemnity.

Then everything is fine, just make sure that no one else can simply use the scaffolding and that’s it.
Olli

No no, ladders are put away every time and care is taken.

It would be interesting to know if a lawyer specializing in social law shares the same opinion. In my opinion, the inventiveness of chambers, social funds, and so on up to the renamed GEZ in broadening their forced membership base has long since exceeded the limits of decency.

At the same time, I wrote to the good man from the BG and he pretty much confirmed that to me. But you are absolutely right.

I had simultaneously contacted the gentleman from the BG and he more or less confirmed it for me. But you are completely right there.

If you asked someone from the same BG who wrote to you, then in my opinion you have sufficient clarity – they can only have one opinion on the same case.

If you asked someone from the same BG who wrote to you, then in my opinion you have sufficient clarity – they can only have one opinion on the same case.

exactly, it was from the same person