If I tell you now that his hourly rate is 300 €, you will probably be annoyed about your career choice ;).
No no, don’t worry. My career choice was definitely right. Rather than struggling as a lawyer for 300€/h, I play the Advocatus Diaboli for 0€. Not to annoy you, but to provide some ideas about where this could be going. If you can refute my concerns, then you are on a good path.
But I calculate high chances. The general contractor (GU) presents himself as a site manager and in reality is a butcher.
Training as a butcher doesn’t matter; he can hire subcontractors as he pleases. The site manager is the one stated on the building permit. A site manager must have expertise and experience. But since these two points are, as far as I know, not further specified, it’s all very vague and the outcome uncertain. With bad luck, some foreign expert site manager will be pulled out of the hat during the process, who cannot be held accountable. An opposing lawyer could definitely pull something off there.
3 expert reports unanimously state that none of his work is in order.
Yeah, then he initially has the right to fix it. But we have discussed that at length already. It gets tricky where you worked around the general contractor and parallel commissions took place. Let your expensive expert unravel that properly, otherwise it could backfire on you :(
The site manager, who didn’t recognize the grossest mistakes and, despite an ongoing contract and multiple requests, simply stopped showing up.
If the contract with the site manager does not stipulate penalties, this will just fizzle out. I don’t think anything can be gained here. The hours worked have to be paid. I’m afraid the site manager can only be held accountable if he documented in writing that the trades were in order. For unnoticed mistakes, it looks bleak.
A lawyer who declared an extraordinary termination without the prior necessary warning of this.
That is possible for an important reason. If continuing is unreasonable, then termination without notice occurs. I think the lawyer will be able to justify this. The question is what damage might have arisen from this. And the question is what this means for the general contractor, to whom you denied the opportunity to fix defects.
And a really good lawyer who is active in the industrial and large construction site sector.
I hope his knowledge is transferable to a private small construction site. Enough playing the villain, I actually want everything to end positively :)