Hausbau0815
2021-04-07 16:09:39
- #1
means something else. You believe you know things and are right, which, as can be read on the screed topic, is not the case. A Styrofoam carrier for a tub is not mandatory and screed with underfloor heating is not a no-go.
If your preferred installation method had been important to you, you should have told the screed layer that the screed needed to be stopped. But for that, you would have had to inform him of the size of the tub and up to where the screed needed to be stopped.
Contrary to my intention not to comment further on this, I am doing so once again:
If I have claimed something here, it was not because I believe it to be so, but because an expert has said so and recorded it. If you have a different opinion about it, so be it. But I still trust the findings of the TÜV expert. Also, the underfloor heating under the tub was not the only reason for the necessary screed renewal, but more so the non-reduced insulation under the shower drains and the associated too low screed coverage of the underfloor heating in the showers. The screed is already broken in one corner here. I hope this suffices to clarify that I am not making pointless demands just to be able to complain about something.