Construction progress: Duplex with WU basement and developed attic

I would simply call it "freedom of trade" when it comes to the general contractor, and unfortunately mailbox general contractors are not uncommon and are not formally illegal either. I don’t know about site managers; this probably varies from state to state, who can be appointed – sometimes the client herself (by the way: you have long been the actual contractor yourself here, why you are still dragging the general contractor along beside you, only the gods understand – that’s why I am also “confident” that he will ride it out calmly, just how long you will need to realize this), and it’s not uncommon to pin this label on the know-it-all father-in-law, who after all once drove a truck for a construction company. Such tradesmen don’t read the package inserts either, even though they speak the same mother tongue as the mortar manufacturer. And you have already been pointed out several times to a possible causality between price and quality of performance – not everyone can be crazy or driving on the wrong side. Appreciative treatment rarely motivates one to “wall in” the offcuts and empties behind the cladding. Sure, you have indeed encountered a lot of unbelievable things here. But you don’t seem to be completely blameless in this either: to my ears, the underlying attitude “everyone is an idiot except me” constantly resonates here.

You really have bad luck with the house. The first general contractor secured his money. Surely nothing can be proven against him in court. You must prove intent, otherwise you are the one who will be prosecuted and convicted for false accusation (criminal offense)! Mr. X only wanted to use you, even though I can't see what advantage he had. The Bulgarian general contractor only wanted your money, which was certainly also regulated in the contract. The second (third) general contractor, a butcher, has no idea. Although butchers also have nice houses and the profession is honorable. The butcher is now also securing his money with his tactic. And your threats are coercion!!! and futile. Here the question arises for me why a local company was not used from the beginning, or did they already know you and then did not want to? At your price, it couldn't have worked from the beginning. It was obviously set too low, which even laymen can see. It is also criminal to drive someone into ruin since it is obvious that the price is not sufficient. Here you would have had a duty to inform the general contractor! A general contractor from farther away who also stands behind the services of the first general contractor... Honestly, that sets off all alarm bells for everyone. No proper craftsman does that. But obviously you get what you order at a cheap price :) It has been mentioned here several times, not only are the others the problem here. :p As you have pointed out several times, everyone can express their opinion here. Even if you often have comments about this, my opinion stands. It is not always the others. You also bear a large part of the misery.

It would be nice if you would mark your statements as satire. Every point of your statements regarding legal opinion is simply wrong.

It was not satire. If you have followed the deleted 150... pages carefully, you simply come to the conclusion that she really has bad luck with the selection of her companies. You are completely wrong about the legal statements. It is as I wrote. It has happened to me as well. It was expensive!

Anything new?