Home financing ever possible? Probably not!

What you are saying is nothing other than that the employer should spend a lot of money to equip parking spaces with charging points that are used in a grid-friendly way. For the people who actually need to charge, the 4 pillars at the entrance are enough. If we talk about great models, we also have to talk about who pays for it and why. If I personally install a wallbox and charge in a way that benefits my home grid, that is great. But no employer will spend €2000-3000 per parking space so that employees can run their heating from their car or so that it goes completely generically into the grid. Yes, you have to talk about billing models. I am just skeptical that in the end there will really be a result that makes it attractive to offer your car as a battery for other people. At the low end, no one participates, at the high end it is cheaper to implement the storage directly at the grid level. Other technologies are also simply more suitable than lithium-ion for stationary large-scale storage.

And nowhere is it written that the car should be available as a storage for other people. I rather think of my own supply. Charging the car during the day with photovoltaics, using the electricity in the evening and at night.
I don’t understand why it is not simply allowed. Whoever wants to use it, will do so; whoever doesn’t, simply won’t. Depending on the driving profile, you can use it more or less.

There really shouldn’t need to be a discussion about this.

There are many reasons against it.

The one and probably most important is efficiency. We already have partially too little (renewable) electricity, and it does not make sense to reduce that even more through charging and discharging losses. At low power levels, this can even be up to 30%!

Next is the wear and tear of the batteries. It probably does not make sense to wear out the expensive lithium battery in the car just to save a few cents. Sure, one could say that everyone can decide that for themselves, but that does not make it any more sensible.

And since over 60% of new registrations are company cars, the issue of personal responsibility becomes even more problematic. Basically, the current subsidies are already highly questionable, but if they are also used to drive electricity from the employer to home, then from my point of view, that urgently needs to be stopped.

So here, too, it is about temporarily setting selfishness aside and thinking about what makes sense for us as a state.


uhm, yeah, so you just decide that now?

No, that is my opinion.

According to your arguments, I shouldn't install a storage system for photovoltaics either.
Just so that I don't have to buy an expensive storage system for bidirectional charging.

There are many reasons against it.

Do you remember Chernobyl and Fukushima? How many reactors had to be taken offline in France last summer for safety reasons?

What on earth does that have to do with corruption and greed?

Where do you want to store the nuclear waste? In your garden?