Home financing ever possible? Probably not!

How many billions do the remnants of the reactor accidents in Chernobyl and Fukushima still cost annually? How many more years will these costs continue to arise?

But hey: fortunately, it didn’t happen in Germany, but far away abroad...

Nuclear energy is therefore neither clean nor safe. With the money wasted on this, you could really advance the expansion of renewable energies and would consequently have a benefit for decades.

The new ones are 100% safe, meltdown and the like no longer possible. Not even a terrorist attack or anything else would be a problem. Feel free to take a look at dualFluid technology. Much of it is market ready.

Cutting down forests for wind turbines I consider nonsense. Likewise, disfiguring the landscape with them. Offshore is okay. But these are exactly the questions that need to be clarified.

Coal and oil are certainly no longer suitable for the future.

Nuclear energy is therefore neither clean nor safe. With the coal being wasted here, you could really push the expansion of renewables forward and would consequently have a benefit for decades.

It wouldn't have had to be new nuclear power plants, just continuing to operate existing ones. I still don't understand why we put up with this and why it was especially a black/yellow government that came up with the idea.

The new ones are 100% safe, meltdown and the like are no longer possible. Not even a terrorist attack or anything else would be a problem. Feel free to also take a look at dualFluid technology. Much of it is market-ready.

Cutting down forests for wind turbines I consider nonsense. Likewise messing up the landscape with them. Offshore is okay. But these are precisely the questions that need to be clarified.

Coal and oil are certainly no longer suitable for the future.

100% safe? Just because no faults could be imagined in the FM EAs, 100% safety will never exist.

Then no "forests are [cut down] for wind turbines." If anything, corridors and clearings are made in forests. We barely have any real forest in Germany except where you'd have to land the wind turbine with Elon's rockets. The spoiling of landscapes has already been accomplished by monocultures and the extraction of fossil fuels in Germany itself.

100% sure

Aren't you always saying here that you are an engineer?

Interesting point of view. So the Saudis are to blame because they extract the oil, not us because we burn it. That would also mean that Wüsthof is to blame if someone gets stabbed with one of their kitchen knives. And no... the dinos are not dead because CO2 decreased, but because a global killer struck Yucatan about 66 million years ago.

But your "global killer" led to a sort of "nuclear winter," temperature drop, decline in plant growth and CO2, as well as dinosaur extinction as a consequence. With today's plant growth, herds of 30-ton dinosaurs, which according to fossils once existed, certainly could not survive. They would have grazed the earth bare and then starved. And also no 12-ton predators that possibly fed on the 30-tonners. (What kind of CO2 emissions would a 12-ton T. rex have had when accelerating?)

(Disclaimer: It is of course true that a completely ice-free, warmer world after the adaptation phase is richer in species and "more productive." But that practically does not interest the corpses that pave the way there.)

The transition to a colder world would lead to extreme struggles for distribution, no question. But why should corpses "pave" the way to a warmer world, in which there is more to share? I do not understand that.

How many billions do the aftermaths of the reactor accidents in Chernobyl and Fukushima cost annually again? How many more years will these costs continue to arise?

But hey: fortunately, it didn't happen in Germany, but far away abroad...

Therefore, nuclear energy is neither clean nor safe. With the money wasted here, you could really advance the expansion of renewables and would have a benefit for decades to come.

Of course, nuclear energy is safe if corruption and greed are prevented.

But your "Global Killer" led to a kind of "nuclear winter," temperature drop, decline in plant growth and CO2 as well as dinosaur extinction were the consequences of it.
With today’s plant growth, herds of 30-ton dinosaurs, which apparently once existed according to fossils, certainly could not survive. They would graze the earth bare and then starve. And also no 12-ton predators that possibly fed on the 30-tonners. (I wonder what kind of CO2 emissions a 12-ton T. Rex produced while accelerating.?)

Well, that was more a problem between cold-blooded and warm-blooded animals. Because mammals obviously survived that.

But I think you should rather go to sleep so that you get to school on time tomorrow. You learn all that there, so I don’t have to explain it to you?