Home financing ever possible? Probably not!

Well, that was more a problem between cold-blooded and warm-blooded animals. Because the mammals obviously survived that.

I have to ask: Doesn't cold-blooded and warm-blooded have more to do with horses? By the way, the direct descendants of the dinosaurs still live among us: the birds! Just compare the illustration of the skeleton of a domestic rooster with a T-Rex skeleton. ;) A domestic rooster is just smaller, after all, there was less to eat because of climate change...... By the way, birds, like mammals, are "warm-blooded" animals and can regulate their body temperature. Maybe the saurian could as well......

Of course nuclear energy is safe if you prevent corruption and greed.

Do you remember Chernobyl and Fukushima? How many reactors had to be taken offline in France last summer for safety reasons? What on earth does that have to do with corruption and greed? Where do you want to store the nuclear waste? In your garden?

The new ones are 100% safe, meltdown and the like are no longer possible. Not even a terrorist attack or anything else would be a problem. Feel free to take a look at dualFluid technology as well. Much of it is market-ready.

Cutting down forests for wind turbines is nonsense in my opinion. Likewise, defacing the landscape like that. Offshore is okay. But these are exactly the questions that need to be clarified.

Coal and oil are definitely no longer future-proof.

And nuclear power plants fit wonderfully into the landscape and require no free areas that first have to be cleared? What about the warm wastewater that heats the rivers in summer? What impact does this have on nature?

Speaking of summer: how safely nuclear power plants can be operated in summer was shown to us by France last summer when they had to take half of all NPPs off the grid due to overheating risk.

How much does a kWh of electricity produced by a nuclear power plant cost compared to photovoltaics?

And nuclear power plants fit wonderfully into the landscape and do not require free spaces that first have to be cleared? What about the warm wastewater that heats up the rivers in summer? What impact does it have on nature?

Speaking of summer: how safely nuclear power plants can be operated in summer was shown to us by France last summer, when they had to take half of all NPPs off the grid due to overheating risk.

How much does a kWh of electricity produced by an NPP cost compared to photovoltaics?

We have NPPs; we wouldn’t need to build more. And in summer, we rather don’t have such a big electricity problem. Whether we look for a final repository for the tons of waste already generated or for a few tons more makes no difference. So one could, with a clear conscience, keep the remaining NPPs on the grid and use them for a few more years.
Especially since it makes no sense for Germany to do something alone again.

how safely nuclear power plants can be operated in summer

After all, the French NPPs are reliably predictable in terms of supply. In winter, there was hardly any snow and it was far too mild, snow reservoirs are practically non-existent, and a few weeks ago the report came out that France went > 30 days without significant precipitation. This means that this summer the NPPs will be shut down one after another due to lack of cooling water and excessively high river temperatures, and we will have to delight the French again with coal and gas power generation. But yes. Nuclear power is good, cheap, and especially in summer, capable of base load and predictable.

And in summer we rather don’t have such a big electricity problem.

See above. Not because of the NPPs, but despite them. Part of the electricity price development last summer was due to the emergency of our neighbors. I fear that this summer we will see price spikes upwards again.

We have nuclear power plants, we wouldn't need to build them. And in summer, we rather don't have such a big electricity problem. Whether we now have to find a final repository for the tons of waste accumulated so far or for a few tons more makes no difference. So one could, in good conscience, keep the remaining nuclear power plants on the grid and use them for a few more years. Especially since it is nonsense that Germany should do something alone again.

How I love this ghost debate. How much does nuclear power actually make up in Germany percentage-wise? Pure ideology topic that contributes nothing to supply security. And again here, ostrich policy: why not invest in other technologies now and permanently move away from the other stuff? Oh yes, I forgot: then you would actually have to take action directly and could not push the problem into the future.