I can only tell a little bit from my personal experience. My car (company car, I don’t have another one) has only a small battery (35.5KWh). I consciously chose it that way because I drive short distances 98% of the time and, yes, there are other vehicles to choose from if it gets to be longer distances. That was previously a Touran (diesel). It has now been replaced by a Model Y. With a larger car battery, I would have more options when charging, for example, I could fully charge the Tesla’s 77KWh battery on weekends (at home with my own photovoltaic system, charging the company for the used kWh) and would probably get through the week with it. Unfortunately, that is not possible with my vehicle. I just didn’t consider it that way :-( So in 2.5 years, “mine” will be replaced with one with a bigger battery. Also, the Tesla is significantly more efficient in battery utilization (it uses on average about 2 KWh less per 100 km than the Mazda). Using the house battery to charge the vehicle, as mentioned above, makes no sense at all. A 10KWh house battery, if it can deliver 3-phase power, would be drained in 1 hour. But it is supposed to bridge the nighttime power demand. Your house will certainly need about 0.5 KWh per hour given the above annual consumption. For the time when nothing is generated, an approximately 10KWh battery probably fits quite well. Even though the arguments from are for the most part correct mEA, high values for self-sufficiency and self-consumption “somehow feel right.” Also, there are studies on the economics of batteries that differ from the above. Sellers always want to sell one anyway since a few extra “K” are in there ;) without requiring massive extra effort. Overall, though, everyone has to make their own calculation since the conditions vary extremely from one another.