Home financing ever possible? Probably not!

Besides climate change, there are many other very important issues currently in our country.

Of course, there are also other important issues, but are they really as important as climate change?
Probably the war, but in terms of energy policy it hits exactly the same note and shows that it is a very bad idea to buy oil and gas because money flows where it shouldn’t.

For me, the report of the World Climate Council speaks a clear language.

And your little problems here, that you can no longer pull your car as relaxed on vacation and therefore maybe have to vacation closer or make a few more stops, or that you sometimes have to refuel at 59 ct/kWh, or that you often stand in traffic jams, or that a fireplace has to comply with certain emissions values, ... sorry, but these problems really don’t matter.

Please don’t fall for this crude public broadcasting propaganda.

Which of my questions made you say that?

I find all my questions justified and without giving an answer there, I hope they will make many think about what the real problems are and what maybe should be seen more relaxed.

The topics of the future are closely interconnected. Without strong finances and prosperity, Europe cannot combat climate change and will have no influence on countries like India or China.

The current migration wave has nothing to do with climate change yet. But we are not even managing that. If countries become uninhabitable, this problem will significantly worsen.

Thus, I see the important fields of action as migration control, slowing down climate change, increasing Europe’s competitiveness and independence, peacekeeping, greater efforts against authoritarians (both from the left and right), neutral media and science, reforming the healthcare system and pensions.

I think everyone personally feels strongly about some of these issues. Due to lobbying, the attention is currently very much focused on the klimaUhus.

These climate clowns talk about the 9 euro ticket and the 100 km/h speed limit. I seriously mean, what is that supposed to be? Why don’t they develop a concept that can be discussed? Why don’t they behave like adults? Why do most of them have no job, education, or even a somewhat reasonable demeanor?

Besides climate change, there are many other very important issues currently in our country. Should every group now stick themselves to the street or commit other crimes? Do we want to treat each other like that? I am very glad that according to polls, 90 to 95% strictly reject these climate owls.

Point 1: Why do you disparagingly call these people clowns? From now on, I will call you Trollpeter, apparently such nicknames are okay for you if they are true from the user’s perspective.

Point 2: Why exactly are the 9 euro ticket and the speed limit not a concept for CO2 reduction in your view? I know, Trollpeter doesn’t want to be restricted and wants to enjoy freedom by rushing into the end of a traffic jam at 180 km/h.

Point 3: I am still waiting for your answer on how exactly climate stickers disturb you in your work as an engineer.

Point 4: Have you already registered in the Brigitte forum by now?

I am still waiting for your answer on exactly how climate glue activists disturb you in your work as an engineer.

Quite simple: I read in the news about climate glue activists and get upset about it for the next two hours.

Point 2: Why exactly are the 9-euro ticket and speed limit not concepts for CO2 reduction for you?

You are asking the wrong question. Of course, you can save CO2 with a speed limit, and of course, it also saves something if people take public transport instead of driving. But the question is whether these are the best solutions we have. And there the 9-euro ticket is highly questionable. It only benefits people who live where good public transport already exists. However, you can get monthly tickets almost everywhere for under 100 euros or the full costs for 300 km of driving (in city traffic probably significantly less). So price cannot be the decisive problem. Instead, public transport is now definitively cemented in the "bad but cheap" category, because it cannot be further expanded at dumping prices.

If you look for the best solutions, i.e., solutions that save the most for little money and effort, you quickly end up with emissions trading. Trading pollution rights is, of course, highly suspect in the left-wing and green spectrum. But ultimately, emissions trading leads on the one hand to savings where they are cheap, and on the other hand, the amount of pollution is much more precisely controllable than reducing car traffic emissions indirectly multiple times through increased public transport use by cheaper tickets.

Point 1: why do you disparagingly call these people clowns? From now on I will call you Trollpeter, apparently such nicknames are okay with you if they make sense from the user's point of view.

Point 2: Why exactly are the 9-euro ticket and speed limit not a concept for CO2 reduction for you? I know, Trollpeter does not want to be restricted and enjoys freedom by crashing into the end of a traffic jam at 180 km/h.

Point 3: I am still waiting for your answer on exactly how climate glueers disturb you in your work as an engineer.

Point 4: have you actually registered in the Brigitte forum by now?

I am happy to answer your provocative questions.

Point 1: other words I would like to use here would not be allowed. Point 2: ever poured a glass of water into the Rhine? Point 3: They endanger jobs and my future. Point 4: no idea what that is.