Floor plan design single-family house (city villa 140 sqm) on a slope with double garage

  • Erstellt am 2018-07-13 11:06:26

kaho674

2018-07-16 09:32:14
  • #1
Ok, that was again the same old story from Climbee - I think the OP already understood it by post 4 or 5 - we are now at 209.

What we are all currently missing is the textual version of the development plan. There is usually always a text section to the map that precisely defines the heights and shapes the houses are allowed to have. Knee wall, roof shape, any special features. Some cities even specify the facade color, others the window thickness - it can be anything. It would also be important to know if there are no regulations and whether they perhaps plan to make another adjustment in the near future - that could still happen.
 

Franky73

2018-07-16 10:00:45
  • #2


I understand that, but you don’t know the whole story. Before, when I contacted the structural engineer, it was supposed to be a bigger house. If that came across wrong here, the offered house was larger than 140 sqm and was created with a design plan by the structural engineer. Later, our private situation changed completely, which is why there is now much less usable space and the consideration of a different type of house. Of course, that then comes across as totally uncoordinated.


I underestimated that and informed myself too little - yes!


No, only a walkway on top at the street. The other side is just a road.



But I had read the development plan several times. Since there were no explicit conditions in it, I thought there weren’t many special features except that one may build 1-story there.



Well, I thought I’d take a professional who supports you before I make mistakes myself.



No, I am now completely unsettled and don’t want to make another mistake just because I “thought this was right”!



I am doing that, but you get different approaches here as well. But which one is the right or most sensible? It may come across to you like that, but it’s not my intention. I am just currently at the building authority and I have already contacted the relevant general contractors, soil investigation, and elevation survey. So accusing me of complete outsourcing right now is not fair!



We have already been to houses that we like, talked to the owners, and of course, we have also been to model house parks. Once again, I lacked the approach on what I have to build upon.

You wrote it yourself. Why consider a city villa if it is not allowed to be built there according to the development plan. Yes, but then the structural engineer said “you can build anything, you just have to observe the 2/3 rule and then you can build them as well.”

If you get such statements from your "professional & contact person" who is an expert, why am I then stupid or naïve? If I now hire a general contractor, I have to trust him too, otherwise, the whole cooperation makes no sense!

Also, from the design planning to the incidental building costs (plot, etc.) all the details matched! You then assume it is all solid!?

Yes, with the Lithuanian company my “being stingy is cool” mania was probably aroused, I admit that. The argument that all other big providers also buy parts and work gangs from the region sounded realistic to me, especially after talks here with neighbors who have also worked with prefabricated house providers.

Anyway, I want to do everything better now, hence the somewhat insecure manner![/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 

Climbee

2018-07-16 10:03:32
  • #3
Ok, I think you are on a good path. Good luck with that! You were lucky with the [Gehwegverteilung] already ;-P
 

ypg

2018-07-16 10:25:38
  • #4
Franky, not Katja... You.

Whoa, that's straight talk

I wish you would first clarify everything for yourself: calculation, equity, what financing is possible, development plan..., before you get more involved with the house.
 

Franky73

2018-07-16 11:17:09
  • #5

I just came back from the building authority!

So all the data I mentioned was correct.


    [*]Floor area ratio = 0.3
    [*]open development (only single and semi-detached houses permitted)
    [*]in combination with a single-storey construction
    [*]These development structures ensure a form of development appropriate to housing needs!
    [*]Building boundaries 3m from the specified street boundary lines
    [*]The built-up plot areas are sufficiently specified so that individual development intentions can be realized. The structural utilization of the respective plots should not be impaired by building boundaries set too tightly.


When asked why nothing explicit about the required knee wall heights was included, the answer was: "It is a single-storey construction, so this question does not arise!"

Could one roughly work on a draft based on these findings?
 

Zaba12

2018-07-16 11:19:54
  • #6

Have you read the last post from ?
 

Similar topics
28.12.2013Conversion of agricultural land to building plot, objection, building authority, building regulations12
12.08.2014Construction method: Prefabricated house Solid house Construction supervisor Architectural planning18
28.06.2015Knee wall height / Proposal from the building authority33
20.06.2016Building Authority Approval10
11.04.2017Building authority wants site inspection114
04.07.2017Problems with the building authority due to soil slips and retaining walls!27
13.07.2017Do you need the building approval from the building authority?15
05.12.2017Aerated concrete / brick / monolithic construction - who is familiar with it?31
07.11.2017What questions should be asked to the building authority?19
17.07.2018Steel frame single-family house - Recommended alternative construction method?16
20.09.2018Idea collection floor plan single-family house, open construction method43
11.09.2018Border construction in open building style - Is neighbor approval necessary?14
09.06.2019Cladding after moving in and construction method?12
05.11.2019Which heat pump to use in monolithic construction?33
17.12.2020Is financing possible with ING?201
05.06.2021Single-family house city villa approx. 180 sqm + separate apartment 70 sqm - open design23
12.02.2024Preliminary design via the architect and then tendering?16
02.03.2025Masonry - individually planned single-family house construction17

Oben