Construction company halts work despite overpayment

  • Erstellt am 2019-08-11 09:55:26

tumaa

2020-01-19 00:18:50
  • #1
I think what the OP is doing here is good, he also wants to warn others, this has nothing to do with *defamation* as long as it can be proven.

Such service providers should be stripped of their title forever.

is really conspicuous, everyone who reads this thread says: what a mess. Then you register to write that it is not right from the OP. Mistakes can always happen, but the most important thing is how to deal with them, only if nothing is done afterwards, then a mistake has been made.

Fingers crossed for you .
 

DerGesselige

2020-01-19 00:33:03
  • #2
Whoever thinks they have to earn their money by harming other people will eventually be punished for it in life. I wish that all those involved (probably including Kaninchen) experience only the worst ;) That and nothing else is what black sheep like her deserve. Do you have children? If so, I hope they are not already that corrupt! ;) Many greetings
 

WingVII

2020-01-19 00:36:27
  • #3
I agree. And it doesn’t clearly violate the forum rules either, contrary to what some little birdies are chirping. The OP has actually substantiated all the negative statements I can find.
 

Hausbau2019

2020-01-19 05:22:06
  • #4


Good morning, since I have had 2 puppies since yesterday, whom I have to "carry out for walks" every 3 hours so they become housebroken, I am already here again. I don’t have to prove anything to Rabbit1, besides, I have the impression that he/she is not as much an outsider as he/she portrays. But so that everyone else can form an opinion and to comply with the forum rules, I wanted to post an excerpt from the report with the list of defects, but apparently PDFs are not allowed. Only photos? Does anyone know about this? As further proof of my statements, I could also post the shareholder agreement, which shows that Mr. Z. was already removed as managing director as of 31.05.2019 or agreed to be removed. However, his name is on it. Is that okay for proof?
 

kaho674

2020-01-19 08:49:57
  • #5

I can’t say if PDFs don’t work at all anymore. It might just be a file size issue once there are multiple pages. However, PDFs are not recommended anyway because many people can’t read them. So it’s best to convert them to JPGs.
 

Hausbau2019

2020-01-19 08:57:58
  • #6
ok. Thanks. I'll try that. And how does it work with the name in the document?
 

Similar topics
06.11.2012Costs for energy consultant proof KFW7018
09.07.2015Energy Saving Ordinance Proof vs. Energy Saving Ordinance Proof + KfW-70 Proof13
11.09.2016KfW - Construction supervision / verification / acceptance23
05.01.2020Gas heating + photovoltaics possible without proof15
03.09.2021Proof that the demolition object is free - Berlin18

Oben