Construction company halts work despite overpayment

2019-08-11 22:42:43

Is a settlement even realistic, or is it just about stringing you along to prepare the insolvency?

2019-08-11 22:42:58

He is indeed a GmbH, that's true. But if I can prove fraud against him, then it would also have to apply to [Private]. If he has been preventative, then it belongs to his wife.

2019-08-11 22:42:58

That is understandable and OK that you are emotional about it. Sometimes one loses sight of the goal because of it. I wish you all the best.

2019-08-11 22:44:20

That's exactly what I think, too. It's all stalling tactics. But you would have to prove that.

2019-08-11 22:47:14

Thank you. Believe me, I know my goal.

2019-08-11 22:50:29

He is indeed a GmbH, that’s true. But if I can prove fraud against him, then it should also apply to private individuals. If he prevented it, however, then it belongs to his wife.

Fraud? I quote:

Because I was not willing to pay additional charges, e.g. for the statics, and he apparently miscalculated and now wanted to recover this through additional charges. Furthermore, I pointed out numerous defects to him and demanded cost reimbursement: 500 tons of soil excavated too much, boundary stone damaged, basement built 10 cm too far out, excavation reintroduced contrary to the soil report. Sewage pipes not installed professionally ........ There probably wouldn’t have been enough left for him.

I see at most negligence because he took care of nothing. A chain of unfortunate circumstances. How do you want to prove fraud here??
However, I am not able to assess the matter of stopping the construction here, but it probably isn’t fraud either.

Please, dear Hausbau2019, don’t run yourself into a corner any further. Try to keep legal costs low instead of constantly filing applications, reports, etc. Don’t throw good (remaining) money after bad (lost) money.

Construction company halts work despite overpayment

Tassimat

Hausbau2019

hampshire

Hausbau2019

Hausbau2019

Tassimat