...On this occasion, we noticed again this morning that through the kitchen bay window you probably don't really catch much morning sun, because a large tree on the neighboring property - at least initially and sustainably - prevents this.
...
And that didn't come up in all the visualizations???
Shows that your V. cannot replace the visit to the property, which one should increasingly do during the planning phase and make an effort to see how this or that will directly take effect.
Even though you write that you spend all day dealing with the house, I am confused.
I could read somewhere that numbers, e.g. for the flooring, are specified for you. Have you ever been to stores yourselves to look for tiles or parquet?
Or have you juggled the numbers yourself? That should never be taken away from you.
Personally, I also find discussions about 20 cm more or less at 5.80 or 6.10 m depth of a living room a complete waste of time: there the living and dining areas are arranged symmetrically, so the depths change again anyway. Since it is only about the TV distance problem, which depends on the size of the TV and personal perception anyway, one has to say: that all changes over time!
A bit less theory, a bit more closeness to the house would be appropriate.
I think it’s great that you have a large budget for the house. And it will certainly be a great house!
But is it really sensible to plan every annual liquid possibility (20,000) into the house financing?
Even if your salaries _in theory_ can handle it – why do you tie yourselves up so tightly?
A bit more composure would do the house good: things always turn out differently than planned.
Regarding the thread: unfortunately, I don’t even know anymore which plan it is about [emoji28]
Then I suddenly read about a completely new house (hip roof instead of flat), which is confusing.
Maybe a new thread with a link wouldn’t be a bad idea?