Floor plan draft for a 220m² single-family house

The door doesn't bother the floor plan. The question is how expensive it is. And the risk of burglary would also be reduced without a door.

There will also be bicycles, etc. in the garage. Maybe even empties and stuff.

If you also keep the trash cans in the garage, travel frequently, and often need to load/unload the cars, the door might be worthwhile. It depends on your lifestyle. A typical T-30 fire protection door with corresponding safety features and installation costs less than 1,000 EUR. Considering the total price, it’s practically a bargain.

... A bit more calmness would do the house well: things always turn out differently than planned anyway
.........?

What do I mean by that?
It’s just a house! You can build a house cheaply, but also expensively – small or big. Usually, it will be economically viable and also resellable at some point without loss of value.
But at some point, a house is saturated – you don’t get paid back for additional extras anymore. Some perfection is eventually unnecessary. The house doesn’t gain anything – only in the eyes of the homeowner who has long since moved in and got lost in having everything planned.
(Best example: Your first post in this thread shows that you were already very satisfied with the design...) now it is exactly like that...
That’s about perfection and the goal to “sink” countless euros even after moving into the house

And then the first child comes, and then twins... perfection is over... or no child comes... or perfectionism drives one of you out of the house... (if the lavender-colored walls to the dark red? couch haven’t done it already [emoji6])
And as I already wrote in the electrical thread: you plan to charge the phones in a certain corner of the house... and after moving in, you simply don’t do it there, but somewhere else. You simply need some calmness in planning right from the start, because not everything is plannable. Homeowners who pass this on to the house.

I think it’s good if the budget allows it to tweak the house’s planning up and down, to equip it with this and that, but eventually the
house is full. At some point, you have to start living instead of just dwelling

I don’t think you understand what I’m trying to convey – I also write a lot with metaphors and would now like to have moved a paragraph, which doesn’t work with a tablet – but please don’t be mad at me, because it’s not meant badly [emoji847]

I don't think you understand what I'm trying to convey - I also write a lot with metaphors and would now like to have moved a paragraph, which is not possible with a tablet - but then don't be mad at me, because it is not meant badly

Yes, I do understand that; I don't put on my pants with a pair of pliers.

I understand it as you also like to plan a nice house, with a desired room program, etc. but that for you maybe things like smart home, Q3 wall quality, etc. are rather aspects that are not so crucial for you, as they only add subjective value.

I understand it as you also like to plan a nice house, with a desired room program etc., but that for you perhaps things like Smart Home, Q3 wall quality etc. are rather aspects that are not so decisive for you, as they only subjectively increase value.

No, completely wrong.

Certain things, especially aesthetics, are important to me and us in and on the house, and that was also implemented. But ultimately, the house is not the center of all areas of our lives, but only a means to an end, to live as comfortably and beautifully as possible.

Building an impressive house for its own sake is one thing. Another is when you start saving on things that are common at this house level (garage door to the interior or also, which I only just saw now, a kitchen exit to the "kitchen terrace").
In this respect, I found it completely absurd when you started to continue planning the shell so "playfully," but save on normal things. The main thing is impressive from the outside. Everything else will be done over the years.
I certainly have nothing against services that can wait. But with you, the focus on the house shell is very noticeable.
That somehow doesn’t fit.

The house, building the house, is a milestone in life, but there are other, not plannable, more important ones.

We currently have 2 houses, one similar comparable to yours, the other approximately. Both unsellable for over a year. Reasons for separation. Both are now rented out, are being "worn out" by strangers, the gardens are stagnating.

Above a certain budget, a house is no longer easily sold. Above a certain sum, you build yourself.

And the higher the basic standards (the house is also just a placeholder), the greater the risk of feeling trapped in a golden cage.

Another thing is when you start saving on things that are common at this house level (interior door to the garage or also, what I just saw, a kitchen exit onto the "kitchen terrace").

We are not building a common house but we are building our house. Why should we build a kitchen exit if neither my wife nor I want it? We will not make a terrace there either. It slopes there and you have the neighbor's large fir tree next to you. This has nothing to do with saving; we simply do not want it because we do not feel comfortable with it.

And the interior door to the garage came about because originally we had the kitchen on the left and you could go directly from the garage into the pantry. Why is it not legitimate to consider whether we really need the access to the cloakroom? Because it is common elsewhere?

Above a certain budget, a house is no longer simply sold. Above a certain amount, you build it yourself.

Exactly. That is why we are building and not buying anything used.

We currently have 2 houses here, one similar comparable to yours, the other approximate. Not for sale for over a year.

It is perfectly clear that such a house purchase entails a corresponding risk. For us, it is not an investment but the highest form of consumption one can choose.

Overall, we are very satisfied with what we have planned. We do not feel that we have saved excessively somewhere or that something is missing. On the contrary. We have a lot of space, will be able to furnish it in an upscale manner without ending up in the luxury segment, and it also looks decent from the outside. I cannot see that we focused too much on the exterior and too little on the interior. Therefore, I do not understand how you come to that conclusion.

You still haven't understood me - it's my fault... I'm talking to a man, and apparently I can't do that on this topic

Regards, Yvonne