R.Hotzenplotz
2017-08-26 21:48:10
- #1
That would mean the terrace is practically in the upper right "in the middle of the living room - surrounded on two sides"? I don't think you gain much usable space in the end. More problematic are the possible placements in the living and dining area with the terrace wrapping around the corner. You could place the dining table underneath, which already feels cramped right next to the kitchen door. The couch/TV situation is similar to before. It would be interesting to see what the distance from wall to wall would be then. You had written 5.80. Is that realistic? The study would apparently remain as it is.
The exterior visualization would then be very interesting. I think the terrace area is bothersome somewhere if you look at the couch through the window on your left instead of having an unobstructed view of the spacious property. Instead, you look to the right, where it doesn’t look appealing and the terrain slopes down to the neighboring property.
On the other hand, I would have gone for a solution where the balcony basically stands above the open area below and you have a clear view to all sides despite the roof.
But I’ll also ask the other way around: If costs didn’t matter, would you still prefer your sketched approach or leave it as it was? I think this block would bother me a lot.
The exterior visualization would then be very interesting. I think the terrace area is bothersome somewhere if you look at the couch through the window on your left instead of having an unobstructed view of the spacious property. Instead, you look to the right, where it doesn’t look appealing and the terrain slopes down to the neighboring property.
On the other hand, I would have gone for a solution where the balcony basically stands above the open area below and you have a clear view to all sides despite the roof.
But I’ll also ask the other way around: If costs didn’t matter, would you still prefer your sketched approach or leave it as it was? I think this block would bother me a lot.