R.Hotzenplotz
2017-06-21 06:35:43
- #1
Good morning,
first of all, thanks for the feedback.
Attached first is the plot orientation (with old building; facing north).
I have also attached the requested jpg files of the ground floor and upper floor. I left out the basement as it is not up to date. I had posted it for completeness from a previous version. It will be adjusted once we agree on the ground floor and upper floor... so please do not pay attention to the details yet. I had overlooked the guest room and the light well; of course, that will not remain as is.
Also, two photos of the plot.
Yes, that is true. Certainly, this is the result of wanting our living area to be large (and especially actually 6.40 m long). You really have to look at it when a 3D visualization is created and you can virtually walk through the house. Then we can better grasp it. He will create one once we basically agree on a draft.
You will laugh. I once drew a suggestion for the architect myself, which looks like the amateur sketch attached. But in the end, he brought us the posted proposal first, because the connection between garage, pantry, and kitchen weighed more than the cloakroom... but certainly both options are possible. I prefer the direction of my sketch, my wife prefers the architect’s design.
Ditto, I noticed that too. Either the cloakroom is far from the garage or the storage room. It bothers me a bit too, but probably only one of the two will work. Considering how many drafts we have already seen (with various architects), this is a compromise that is conceivable. We have definitely seen about 15 drafts and this one is the closest.
The kitchen tends to be a few square meters too big. That is because the architect wanted to enable access both from there to the dining area and also via the hallway.
I have to say that in the previous draft the study and kitchen were swapped: kitchen facing the terrace and study facing the street. That was a no-go, because I spend a lot of time in the study and do not want to look at the street and passing people but into my garden. So our requirement was definitely to place the kitchen at the front. Your thought is understandable. Honestly, we did not think much about it, but we would probably accept it like this, because the other way around is not an option for us.
see above – basement will be revised
Attached are some more visualizations about this. We like it (except the entrance portal and optical details that are still to be revised).
You mean, you would expand the living room to the back where the couch is? I also considered that, but then we exceed the 220 m² (and probably the budget). And the area we theoretically have too much in the kitchen does not really help us here. But we would have to calculate and see…
The architect will get feedback on that too. We don’t like that you walk from the bedroom past the dressing room (which is still ok) and then past the laundry room to reach the toilet at the other end of the building. I see the laundry room rather at the right building end and the bathroom entrance immediately behind the dressing room….
No idea. We are not that far yet. So far no bathroom layout is fixed that would make you think about furnishing. Bathtub, shower, toilet, washbasin (one sink is enough). That should be feasible given the large space. But as I said, I can’t just pull something out of thin air. Of course, I can ask the architect to draw some fictitious furniture.
That is the result of the diagonally placed staircase (a no-go for us was a staircase left or right next to the entrance where the person entering can look directly upstairs). I definitely have to ask about the width of the corridor on the upper floor! Important note; thanks!! We currently have a width of 1.47 m at home, which is good.
Balcony faces northwest. It is towards the garden anyway. Mostly for optical reasons we placed the balcony and for hanging laundry out. It will probably be used less for sitting. The large garden will offer nice spots everywhere when you want sun. We had many requirements regarding the room program etc. For the orientation there is more flexibility. We don’t necessarily need the classic orientations.
You mean something should have been drawn on the upper floor? What exactly?
I am now collecting some points and questions and will give feedback to the architect. Hopefully, we don't have to start from scratch again; time is running out unfortunately.
Hello Lumpi,
that includes besides the house also the demolition of the old building, surveying costs etc. Also more than the standard construction specifications, e.g. €50/m² floor instead of the standard €25. Before deciding on a provider, I contacted several companies. The different floor plans with our requirements always came to roughly the same price.







first of all, thanks for the feedback.
Attached first is the plot orientation (with old building; facing north).
I have also attached the requested jpg files of the ground floor and upper floor. I left out the basement as it is not up to date. I had posted it for completeness from a previous version. It will be adjusted once we agree on the ground floor and upper floor... so please do not pay attention to the details yet. I had overlooked the guest room and the light well; of course, that will not remain as is.
Also, two photos of the plot.
Hello,
When you enter the house, you first see a staircase. That can be interesting, but it can also make the entrance area feel "uncomfortable". Especially since due to the many doors/hallway branches you will probably find it difficult to furnish the area.
Yes, that is true. Certainly, this is the result of wanting our living area to be large (and especially actually 6.40 m long). You really have to look at it when a 3D visualization is created and you can virtually walk through the house. Then we can better grasp it. He will create one once we basically agree on a draft.
Hello,
I strongly suspect that the pantry will become the cloakroom (even though there is still no door into the house there). The room designated as cloakroom is too far from the garage and also too narrow to move well in there.
You will laugh. I once drew a suggestion for the architect myself, which looks like the amateur sketch attached. But in the end, he brought us the posted proposal first, because the connection between garage, pantry, and kitchen weighed more than the cloakroom... but certainly both options are possible. I prefer the direction of my sketch, my wife prefers the architect’s design.
The room called cloakroom is too far from the garage and also too narrow to move well in there.
I can hardly imagine the kitchen, especially where your paths to the terrace are supposed to be.
The terrace in front of the dining table probably does not exist, because I interpret the window underneath in the guest room as if an excavation would have to be there.
The distance to the TV could be solved by an even deeper recess in the wall. Whether that is good for the facade image - no idea. But I can hardly imagine the many different offsets already now due to lack of imagination...
In the upper floor, a tiny detail stands out very negatively to me: the door to the dressing room is positioned so that you bump into a cupboard. It can be changed very simply.
What might not be so simple: how are the bathrooms supposed to be furnished later? Definitely have furniture drawn in! And also ask how everything can be drained.
Otherwise, I'm not a big fan of the narrow, long corridors. Somehow it works, but in relation to the total size, both in the basement and in the upper floor look very narrow - I also brush along wider corridors with laundry baskets/ the back of the hand on the wall. :-(
Yeah, and if my suspicion is confirmed that either a child’s room or the balcony faces north, I would be interested in the reasons?
Maybe I'll notice more tomorrow after sleeping well. I don't find some approaches bad at all!
Now I wanted to praise the fireplace as an example when I noticed that the chimney would be missing in the other floors?!
So there might possibly be even more changes :-(
The room called cloakroom is too far from the garage and also too narrow to move well in there.
Ditto, I noticed that too. Either the cloakroom is far from the garage or the storage room. It bothers me a bit too, but probably only one of the two will work. Considering how many drafts we have already seen (with various architects), this is a compromise that is conceivable. We have definitely seen about 15 drafts and this one is the closest.
I can hardly imagine the kitchen, especially where your paths to the terrace are supposed to be.
The kitchen tends to be a few square meters too big. That is because the architect wanted to enable access both from there to the dining area and also via the hallway.
I have to say that in the previous draft the study and kitchen were swapped: kitchen facing the terrace and study facing the street. That was a no-go, because I spend a lot of time in the study and do not want to look at the street and passing people but into my garden. So our requirement was definitely to place the kitchen at the front. Your thought is understandable. Honestly, we did not think much about it, but we would probably accept it like this, because the other way around is not an option for us.
The terrace in front of the dining table probably does not exist, because I interpret the window underneath in the guest room as if an excavation would have to be there.
see above – basement will be revised
The distance to the TV could be solved by an even deeper recess in the wall. Whether that is good for the facade image - no idea. But I can hardly imagine the many different offsets already now due to lack of imagination…
Attached are some more visualizations about this. We like it (except the entrance portal and optical details that are still to be revised).
You mean, you would expand the living room to the back where the couch is? I also considered that, but then we exceed the 220 m² (and probably the budget). And the area we theoretically have too much in the kitchen does not really help us here. But we would have to calculate and see…
In the upper floor, a tiny detail stands out very negatively to me: the door to the dressing room is positioned so that you bump into a cupboard. It can be changed very simply.
The architect will get feedback on that too. We don’t like that you walk from the bedroom past the dressing room (which is still ok) and then past the laundry room to reach the toilet at the other end of the building. I see the laundry room rather at the right building end and the bathroom entrance immediately behind the dressing room….
What might not be so simple: how are the bathrooms supposed to be furnished later? Definitely have furniture drawn in! And also ask how everything can be drained.
No idea. We are not that far yet. So far no bathroom layout is fixed that would make you think about furnishing. Bathtub, shower, toilet, washbasin (one sink is enough). That should be feasible given the large space. But as I said, I can’t just pull something out of thin air. Of course, I can ask the architect to draw some fictitious furniture.
Otherwise, I'm not a big fan of the narrow, long corridors. Somehow it works, but in relation to the total size, both in the basement and in the upper floor look very narrow - I also brush along wider corridors with laundry baskets/ the back of the hand on the wall. :-(
That is the result of the diagonally placed staircase (a no-go for us was a staircase left or right next to the entrance where the person entering can look directly upstairs). I definitely have to ask about the width of the corridor on the upper floor! Important note; thanks!! We currently have a width of 1.47 m at home, which is good.
Yeah, and if my suspicion is confirmed that either a child’s room or the balcony faces north, I would be interested in the reasons?
Balcony faces northwest. It is towards the garden anyway. Mostly for optical reasons we placed the balcony and for hanging laundry out. It will probably be used less for sitting. The large garden will offer nice spots everywhere when you want sun. We had many requirements regarding the room program etc. For the orientation there is more flexibility. We don’t necessarily need the classic orientations.
Now I wanted to praise the fireplace as an example when I noticed that the chimney would be missing in the other floors?!
You mean something should have been drawn on the upper floor? What exactly?
I am now collecting some points and questions and will give feedback to the architect. Hopefully, we don't have to start from scratch again; time is running out unfortunately.
What is supposed to cost 720k for the house? Or what is all included?
Hello Lumpi,
that includes besides the house also the demolition of the old building, surveying costs etc. Also more than the standard construction specifications, e.g. €50/m² floor instead of the standard €25. Before deciding on a provider, I contacted several companies. The different floor plans with our requirements always came to roughly the same price.