I’m afraid you’re ruining everything there. I don’t even know if I still have the file anywhere. It’s crazy. Usually it must always be the entrance from the front – symmetrically bright and inviting. This time it is like that and promptly the OP wants the entrance from the left.
What a pity. Yes, honestly I don’t know why I insist so much that the entrance should be at the back. It just feels better. In addition to the possibility of then being able to realize carport and canopy with a roof.
For me, the (parking) situation on this property is a reason not to buy it or at least not compatible with your wishes. Maybe you don’t see any problem in having to maneuver every time. I would probably crash into the neighbor’s gate after a bad day at the office because it simply gets too stressful for me.
Yes, we already had that with the general space discussion in the earlier thread. In Berlin one simply develops different demands or tolerances. In general, I’m also not the kind of impulsive person who goes for property damage to others’ property on bad days.
If you see it differently, I hope you think clearly.
We tested it on paper with scale-accurate models and turning circles taken from data sheets, as well as in reality (albeit with small cars) with drawn areas in the Kaufland parking lot. It even works without any maneuvering. The problem is rather the long backing up either when entering or exiting. But you don’t have to do that at 30 km/h either, you can do it at walking speed. Then it all works. You learn to park in perpendicular parking spaces quickly in the big city. And if later we have to reverse once more with a bigger car, then so be it.
I also thought of cronyism... as I said: if I want something, I don’t rely on this triangular relationship.
Okay, I can understand why with “connections” such a negative association isn’t far away. But seriously, cronyism implies that they somehow collude to my disadvantage to gain an advantage. What would be the supposed advantage on their side in this case? Whether diagonal or straight makes no difference personally for the two of them. On the contrary, with diagonal he could claim more effort under some pretext and put more costs on the bill. She has no advantage from straight and no disadvantage from diagonal either, unless the neighborhood development means that diagonal just “bumps” too much and thus the overall picture is disturbed. From the cadastral extract it’s pretty clear that a street alignment has been desired so far. And thus the verbal rejection seems very plausible to me. I’ll call anyway, the clerk on the phone doesn’t necessarily say straight out that strange Tolentino doesn’t trust his construction manager. And you are right in that I shouldn’t be put off by a phone call for a project costing over half a million.
Is there anyone who can say something about the shafts (#122 ff.)? Can you just build the house over them and put pipes in/under them, or, in the case of the well, lay them past it? Or do you have to tear it down and fill it in? They are made of concrete, about 1.5 m deep each.
Thanks and best regards
Tolentino