kaho674
2020-04-08 09:17:29
- #1
I don’t see it as dramatically either. Usually, it only has advantages if the contact with the office is good. On the other hand, it may have become such a close-knit team that your general contractor, out of anticipatory obedience, doesn’t even push your wishes but always represents the office’s opinion. That gives the impression that the two are building "their" little town as they like it. If a road alignment or building line is not formulated in any development plan, then there simply isn’t one. Ok, the §34 should orient itself to the neighboring development. But whether the orientation of the house belongs to that is debatable – if necessary even in court. If that were extremely important to you, you might open a can of worms. If it’s relatively indifferent to you, I wouldn’t sue the office even before the start.Ok, I can understand why "Connections" can also have a negative association nearby. But seriously, cronyism implies that they somehow collude to my disadvantage in order to gain an advantage. What is supposed to be the assumed advantage on their side in this case?