Location of city villa or single-family house on 500 m2 plot - rectangular

Perhaps the installation instructions from the tile supplier will help you. It could be that the standard structural analysis of the manufacturer is disturbed.

No, the term does not mean the overhang of the wall over the base, but the offset of the butt joints of successive rows of stones, which is supposed to be forty percent, and here may possibly be undershot.

Should it really be 40%? Then they are clearly undershot in the photos.

Savings contract? Conversation with the site manager?
from row 3 have it done correctly

Building savings contract? Conversation with the site manager?
From row 3 onwards, have it done properly

Can you judge it that easily?

At least I would want to know what kind of stone it is.

So, I have now rummaged through Wienerberger Poroton (terribly confusing website). It concerns the Wienerberger Poroton T10 Dryfix 36.5. Apparently, there are no specific processing instructions for this brick, but a general processing manual. There it states for the bricks Ü >= 0.4 h. So 40% of the height of the brick, that is 10 cm. I will measure that again, I could imagine that the perspective causes it. If it is not adhered to too often, the building expert will be contacted.

So, I was just at the property, unfortunately is right. There are various spots where the 10 cm spacing is not maintained. Once almost no overlap at all :(
In other places, as at dimension 4.5 cm, which made me look it up again, since I thought I had read this number somewhere as well.
The processing instructions state that for small formats <=4.5 cm are decisive.
Does the first row possibly count as small format? At the neighbor's, I could see that the later rows consistently maintain the 10 cm spacing. So maybe it only has to do with the first row? Because the stones are narrower?





Of course I will also ask/inform the building expert right away

Best regards

Tolentino