11ant
2017-05-31 19:12:42
- #1
You’ve misunderstood two things thoroughly: First, the advice on the procedure: the layperson—especially in the effort to imitate the architect as best as possible—first ties themselves in knots before even starting to dance. Less is more. Second, what an architect’s fee is for. Not for drawing little plans. That’s the tiniest little fraction of what they do—even though on the other hand it’s almost 100% of what the layperson believes the architect does. By the way, you always pay the architect—better transparently than “included” in the house price. A builder "without an architect" will build your house almost exactly as it is drawn now. They just put the minimum required windows in the exterior walls and also give the second child a door (because there is no building permit for walling up children—otherwise, they wouldn’t have a problem with it), but otherwise exactly with an 83 cm narrow pantry. Every self-drawn floor plan will be built, only permit obstacles will be changed. Doors that collide with each other, rooms you can’t furnish: every customer dream is realized.On the topic of architects: I was initially also in favor of an architect... But then I saw some architect-designed houses and heard from an acquaintance that she had to cough up a five-figure sum just for the plan. That’s when I actually distanced myself from using an architect again..