Very first floor plan draft of the ground floor

  • Erstellt am 2017-05-24 16:24:58

11ant

2017-09-26 19:42:36
  • #1
Dimensions are not bad at all - even valuable information. However, they should not disturb the visual representation; therefore, I find programs that create dimension lines more appropriate. And dimensions should be accurate. So, just because you don't click the mouse button with tenth-of-a-millimeter precision, you shouldn't conclude a room width of 406 cm for one child and 410 cm for the other. And the fireplace being exactly 53 centimeters wide is also silly. One should be able to say, in sketch mode please always round, and for example, set the guidelines to be "magnetic" on a 10 cm grid. Such pseudo-precise numbers are confusing - but being able to see numbers at all is helpful.

If this is supposed to be a 10.3 x 10.6 m exterior dimension, so a 0.3 m difference = ridge length, in my opinion that looks rather "unintended." A ridge length of less than three rafter axes / about 2.5 m I consider awkward. When working with trusses, thinking in rafter axes is also sensible.
 

ypg

2017-09-26 19:54:14
  • #2


You don't notice at all [emoji23]

Just a note: the bigger you plan, meaning the more ballrooms you use, the less a floor plan pinches.
 

MIA_SAN_MIA__

2017-09-26 20:06:47
  • #3
I am also responsible for digitization etc. at work...

Sure, I could make it bigger, but it should stay within limits somewhere. About 180m2 with a basement and about 200m2 if it really has to be without.


Many new buildings have these mini ridges. We think it looks better than a tent roof.

What do you all think about the design? Now it’s really time for the surveyor to come so I can finally go to the planner....
 

ypg

2017-09-26 21:48:10
  • #4


You misunderstood me.
You have already drawn ballrooms that surely you can't afford either. With an estimated 25sqm for the hallway, you're really going big. That's why it seems feasible to you.
 

MIA_SAN_MIA__

2017-09-26 21:56:13
  • #5
Why should a 180m2 house not be affordable for me? Sorry, but that's nonsense
 

ypg

2017-09-26 22:43:52
  • #6


You can certainly afford a 200sqm house as well!

But what you drew there on digital paper is not proportional to your desired measurements.
It's all smoke and mirrors if you put a slightly wider child's bed in the bedroom and think it would fit. Even your doors are barely 79/75 wide, etc.
Your hallway on the ground floor has rough dimensions of 5.4 x 5.5... 29sqm minus the two closets at the entrance... You can dance in the bathroom... a digital person should be able to see that none of this will turn out the way it looks.

Great idea, but I'm out!
 
Oben