11ant
2017-09-26 19:42:36
- #1
Dimensions are not bad at all - even valuable information. However, they should not disturb the visual representation; therefore, I find programs that create dimension lines more appropriate. And dimensions should be accurate. So, just because you don't click the mouse button with tenth-of-a-millimeter precision, you shouldn't conclude a room width of 406 cm for one child and 410 cm for the other. And the fireplace being exactly 53 centimeters wide is also silly. One should be able to say, in sketch mode please always round, and for example, set the guidelines to be "magnetic" on a 10 cm grid. Such pseudo-precise numbers are confusing - but being able to see numbers at all is helpful.
If this is supposed to be a 10.3 x 10.6 m exterior dimension, so a 0.3 m difference = ridge length, in my opinion that looks rather "unintended." A ridge length of less than three rafter axes / about 2.5 m I consider awkward. When working with trusses, thinking in rafter axes is also sensible.
If this is supposed to be a 10.3 x 10.6 m exterior dimension, so a 0.3 m difference = ridge length, in my opinion that looks rather "unintended." A ridge length of less than three rafter axes / about 2.5 m I consider awkward. When working with trusses, thinking in rafter axes is also sensible.