Comments on floor plan design welcome

The OP no longer wants help here, at least not from me, okay. However, this does not extend to me letting nonsense stand without contradiction. So: I did not address the OP’s place of residence, he named it himself in his profile and has since removed it. I referred to the construction site, that was the only thing at issue here. Finding out this was not an achievement by me, but by Google: one shot, four hits, one of them correct. To what every Google Earth user can recognize, I only added one piece of information from my incidental local knowledge (it is, after all, a great vacation area): in the aerial view, you can see the power pole almost vertically from above, not its height — here I “revealed” that the thing has a rather picturesque size (and as a one-and-a-halfth I added that this characteristic is shared by all its colleagues in the area — this is certainly no VS-nfD). If I should ever care about trivial stuff like my “ego,” I would go to the doctor — even if that would be a hedgehog performance.

Does anyone here know what the corporate consultant means by "picturesque"? When I write that it does not offer a nice view, that is my own perspective and thus my wish not to have it in my field of vision. There is no reason to disagree with that (unless someone just wants to make themselves feel important).

The "thing" is about 3x3 meters at the base and about 5 meters high. Overgrown with "brush" at the bottom. Anyone who finds that picturesque... fits with his behavior here in the thread (and also in other threads: "Frosted glass lets in less darkness than cocoa glass" is a very "valuable" statement).

What I want to say: beware of his statements. They are polarizing, partly incorrect, or present his own perspective as universally valid (picturesque). Mostly, however, they are little to no help regarding the question.

The "rest" – the personal matter – is happening behind the scenes right now.

You can think whatever you want about 11ant, but just picking on it and not addressing anything else is very productive

For someone who wants to disappear completely here, you are still quite present...

Anyone who posts a site plan with unredacted street names has to expect something like this - my opinion. If I don’t want that, I redact it. Additional information was probably in the profile, openly visible to everyone. Now deleted, but even for me as a DAU (= Dumbest of All Users) it’s crystal clear: the internet never forgets! Even when I delete something.

This is about a floor plan discussion - but the necessary questionnaire was not even remotely filled out, yet an unredacted site plan was willingly posted. May I just let that sink in (or does that also count as data protection???) and draw my own conclusions? Yes?

For data protection reasons, however, I do not want to express my thought processes here, but everyone is free to start their brain.

Go for it!

This was about a floor plan discussion. While I was in the process of filling out the (detailed) questionnaire, the post from 11ant appeared. Further information from me was deleted without comment by the moderators. However, the moderator team did not comply with my request to delete the entire thread.

Yes, not blacking out the street name was my mistake. I could not correct that (no rights to do so). What people then piece together in their heads is one thing, what they express in writing is another.

The statement "The internet never forgets" is now countered by the GDPR: "Right to be forgotten on the internet."

By the way: Everyone is free to think their own thoughts, but if I were to say or write down all my thoughts, I would end up in court faster than I would like.

Hello Sciliar,
in order to evaluate a floor plan and recommend alternatives or point out problems, it is important to have not only the floor plan but also the property, the site plan, and the surroundings. Only in this way can the optimum be found. Unlike the GU draftsman, architects usually look at the property on-site for this reason.
Many users here in the forum want as much help as possible but want to reveal as little as possible. That makes it difficult. Ideally, in addition to the floor plan, the site plan with building boundaries (which you had) and a vicinity plan or aerial photo (e.g., from Google Maps) should be provided. If a user supplies all this and blacks out the street names, the desire to "investigate" is practically zero because all the information is there.
But if, as here, the information is only partially available, but street names are visible on the plan, some people will look up where that is to be able to help better. If a reaction like yours follows to that, the willingness to help will very quickly decrease. likes to write in the style of the Oracle of Delphi, but, as with the oracle, there is much truth in it; however, the user is still asked to interpret the statements for themselves.