Comments on floor plan design welcome

  • Erstellt am 2020-05-24 10:24:25

11ant

2020-05-26 00:44:09
  • #1
In the district of the TE, there are four places with a Tannenstraße, of which only one matches the map excerpt. His occupation does not suggest naivety in dealing with the internet, and I have not discovered any desire for secrecy even after careful backtracking. Of course, it is a valuable contribution that there are clear signs in the immediate vicinity to take the building boundary limits seriously. But please, if met with ingratitude, I can also withdraw. Among fellow countrymen - after all, I am also from RLP North - one is otherwise happy to help even without a questionnaire.
 

Escroda

2020-05-26 08:41:58
  • #2
I agree with you there. What is unfortunate, however, is that you do not answer the follow-up questions. That then encourages independent investigations. Yes. To give helpful tips, I want to know as much as possible about the property. Often these are conditions that the original poster does not even suspect could be important. But only afterwards. One could have suspected it if he had at least deleted the street name. Those who place great value on anonymity should not turn to a public forum with concrete questions. Especially in building law, so many details are decisive that can lead to a completely different result.
 

sciliar

2020-05-26 10:26:02
  • #3


I never asked for a building law assessment. It was about the room layout and floor plan design. You can also see here in the thread that there are users who understood this very well and gave valuable advice.

For 11ant, it was solely about showing off how great he is at finding the location. That's nice for his ego (fair enough), but posting this publicly can simply lead to legal and social consequences (for me as the OP primarily, whether secondly for him or the forum operators remains to be examined).
 

sciliar

2020-05-26 10:28:08
  • #4
Very interesting, by the way, that my post requesting deletion was removed by the moderators, but his statements and information remain here in the thread, as does the entire thread. This should caution every user here to read and interpret such threads carefully – they are all subject to the moderators' discretion to alter content.
 

Drasleona

2020-05-26 10:52:32
  • #5
I find it a shame that this very interesting topic is being brought to such an absurd conclusion here. I agree with the OP, publishing someone's place of residence without permission is not okay. If you want this information, then ask him for it, or you can say "I found out where it is. You should consider x and y" without broadcasting it. Where will we end up if everyone is allowed to publish other people's data without permission? You are certainly giving all the clues that an experienced person could find and publish your credit card information. Do you want that? Have respect for privacy, honestly!
 

Escroda

2020-05-26 10:58:13
  • #6
I have to contradict you on that: Without a building law review, a floor plan discussion is pointless anyway. I would like to explicitly express my dissatisfaction about this. I consider it right that the thread is not deleted, but I do not find it good to delete your post with the request and ’s response to it. The moderator could at least write a sentence explaining why this is not desired.
 
Oben